@HarmonicTHD, correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't you write: "You seem to know awfully little about the Harman studies (eg based on Rock, Olive’s Paper etc)?" Were you not the one making the claim that I was incorrect that Olive's loudspeaker regression papers were based on ROCK music? Scroll up, I gave you a friendly opportunity to correct yourself, but you didn't take it.
So, now that I have "
brought the proof," will you acknowledge that I was correct, after all?
I'm not sure why it makes sense to you that I first learned that the Olive regression papers were based on rock from information provided by
@thewas "3 posts up." For starters, I pointed out the fact about rock music in post #405 (4:45PM).
@thewas didn't "link" information until post #406 (10:28PM). So, are you saying that I invented a time machine, travelled 6 hours into the future, learned information from
@thewas in post #406, then travelled back in time so that I could post #405?
OH, and one more thing,
@HarmonicTHD, I actually posted about the 4 rock tracks used in the Harman regression studies
4 months ago in my post here.
Now that I have once again "brought the proof," will you acknowledge that you were also incorrect about where I got my information from ?