Sorry if I missed it, but care to give your impression of the 8351B compared to your previous M040 and why you didn't choose the 8341A? Since I have a 8030C and one of the middle Ones as future gift to myself, our situations are very similar.
You didn’t miss anything, I got them very recently and I haven’t updated my original thread about it yet since I still need to take a good picture
My impressions so far:
Compared to Genelec M040 there are a few things that are very noticeable:
- They play lower. the M040s got to around 40Hz in room and the 8351Bs go to about 30Hz for me, if not lower. I’m hearing sub bass information in music I didn’t know was there before.
- The vertical dispersion. This was one of the main points I wanted my new speakers to improve upon. Especially since I’m sitting quite close to them. With the “Ones”, it’s amazing how much you can move around without changing the sound. I can sit up or lean back in my chair and it never feels like I’m missing out on anything. With the M040s the sweetspot was smaller, especially in the vertical plane, and I often felt like I needed to sit completely upright to get the best sound and that gets tiring quickly. I believe Genelec’s RnD director, Aki Mäkivirta, stated in one of their videos that that was one of the design goals with the Ones, to make a monitor that is very non-fatiguing, and it shows.
Things that are somewhat noticable:
- They have less hiss I could barely hear the M040s when they were on. I often noticed the hiss go away when they turned themselves off. I can’t hear the 8351Bs at all when they aren’t playing.
Things that are subtle:
I get the impression that the 8351Bs are “cleaner” somehow. A lot of that is because of GLM I’m sure, which evened out the bass a bit. The M040s had no problem filling my room with sound (I don’t listen very loud I think) but the 8351Bs do it more cleanly and with what appears to be less effort. I’m guessing this is because they have much more power and they probably also have lower distortion.
Miscellaneous thoughts:
I like that volume is controllable through GLM. I knew beforehand that you had to use GLM for volume control if you use the digital inputs on the speakers. What I didn’t know was that volume control through GLM also works for the analog inputs. So now I have the 9310 volume controller placed close to my hand so I don’t have to lean forward to the audio interface to change volume
It’s a nice convenience. I’m still feeding them analog audio, but I’m eyeing the very recently released RME Fireface UCX II which does have an AES output and seems like a good choice.
Amir mentioned in his review that they had “excellent sound with image coming out of a circular halo around the driver”. I can only agree, the sound is quite “holographic” in some sense. Even when I’m looking at the speakers, it doesn’t feel like the sound is coming from them, it feels like the sound is floating in the air in front of them. It’s quite special.
Overall, I love them, but I guess that’s quite apparent based on my impressions above
As for the choice between 8341A and 8351B, I was actually planning on getting 8341As in the beginning. That would have been more sensible really, as I would’t have had to save money for as long as I had to
What led me to the 51s was that my room isn’t very well suited for subwoofers, and that won’t change unless I move somewhere else. So in the meantime, I wanted speakers that could dig a bit deeper on their own. And I thought by getting the bigger ones I would be more “future proof” in a way, because the 51s will work in more scenarios, should I want to have them further away from me in the future for example. Or if I, in the distant future, should stumble upon a good deal on a used pair of W371s, the 8351 seems to be a better suited partner to those. I’m just very into the idea of buying stuff that I can use for a long time without feeling the need to upgrade. I also couldn’t get over my own feeling that the 8351B was somehow “cooler” because it is bigger and was released later than the 8341A.