The problem with most of these measurements is they just don't matter beyond showing the gear was at least partially competently designed. Almost all of the big boy stuff measures well enough to resolve a CD and the recordings on them. Notice I said measures, not that it actually does. Most of this cheap stuff, including the Topping, falls far far behind. Pretending that 120 db snr vs 110 db snr actually matters and you can hear the difference versus say "How dynamic the DAC actually sounds" is ludicrous. The "sound" or timbre of the unit matters a lot more than meaningless specs. Yes all this stuff has a sound and some stuff sounds much clearer than others.
For example:
1) The new RME has a sound and isn't as good/neutral/clear as some gear that doesn't measure nearly as highly (but still is competent) as it due to its sound. Pretending that it's perfect due to the measurements will get you nowhere. Clearly the measurements are not validating human perception of the units' faults. The increased jitter and noise on the original Pro version don't really matter either compared to the human perceivable faults of the thing and gear used in recordings it just isn't very good at reproducing compared to other interfaces.
2) The Schiit Yggdrasil version 1 has respectible enough specs but then power supply bleed, jitter, clock issues, usb interface woes but none of that matters nearly as much as how opaque the unit actually sounds. Even if you feed it over AES from something with a great clock, the Yggdrasil still has the same issues even if you improve stereo separation and transients a tiny bit. The unit measures pretty much okay but just sounds far from neutral. You can't say that's due to the measurements being slightly lower as stuff that measures even worse also sounds more normal than it! The perceptions aren't supporting each other so the conception that they do and that they alone make it worse than gear you like, is a flawed one.
Sure you will come across totally awful sounding (Mytek) or totally incompetent (Mytek) gear sometime that pretty much anyone can hear or measure but that's rare as preference is preference. Most people do not want to hear how incompetent their recordings are, that bass dynamics and extension vary wildly, that the vocals really had no dynamics or body so they were run through some transformer gear. Most gear, especially cheap and insanely priced hi-fi gear, is designed to be euphonic due to this. Measurements won't really tell you this most of the time, only your ears. People should buy what they like the sound of personally (actual clarity or color of their choice) when compared to other gear and not what has the highest numbers in a meaningless race. This of course being if they have appropriate transducers and rooms to do this. Most people don't and most don't pay close attention to music or recordings anyway.
Amir, you should try to qualify the differences yourself as otherwise you're just another internet talking head with an audio analyzer like Nwavguy, Atomicbob, Jude, or randos on reddit just telling people to buy what they like themselves, what makes them the most money, or their own incompetent gear that clips itself during normal use. Yeah people will talk about your measurements but they're just measurements. You have written that you do notice some stuff (the Mytek Brooklyn review and others) and you should spend more time listening to the gear and expanding on it as clearly the typical round of measurements (even the .1 linearity one) aren't really synching up with human perceptions at all. If all you want to is measure stuff, you shouldn't pretend that something with minutely better measurements is actually better or worse than something else that also measurements competently enough and should be bought over the other thing. The actual sound might be worse, more compressed, too diffuse, have a strange timbre, hard to navigate menus or any other sort of problem. Only that it measures competently enough so that it should be able to playback CD quality audio in a good system based on it's measurements. But then that's a "should", not a "does" so it really isn't saying anything at all.