Recent content by AudioSceptic

What's stopping you before next March?

Lots of cassettes were played in cars so would have suffered a lot from heat and (perhaps) cruder mechanisms.

Obvious question: I'd bet that they don't still use it, so could you ask for it back (even if you now use a recorder with SS storage)?

I have to ask: your English is perfect, so have you spent a lot of time outside Россия?

Drifting off-topic but DAT is nearly 40 years old now <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Audio_Tape>. I never got into that but it must've been so much better than cassette, although it came too late to be a medium for pre-recorded music.

Yes, the linear track was no better than cassette. I wonder how Sony's Betamax recorders compared? I still have an SLHF100UB somewhere...

These are all old machines, so how much would head wear play a part in performance?

Yes, as Mr Dernie has reminded us, anything below 2x the resonant frequency is rubbish anyway so don't waste any resources at all on sending it out into the system. <https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/the-courteous-vinyl-playback-discussion.34143/post-2336940>

Nice novelty gift??? Maybe for $23.70, not $237!

This is supposed to be easier to use <https://www.den4b.com/products/renamer>.

I was going to write something but just found this <https://www.bulkrenameutility.co.uk/> Worth a try?

OK. I'll see what I can come up with.

You could do it with a script. Do you use Mac, Linux, or Windows?

Good, much better than a folder for each CD.

You don't like this convention for track numbers in multiple CDs: 1-01 1-02 1-03 etc. for CD 1; 2-01 2-02 2-03 etc. for CD 2; ?