archerious
Active Member
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2020
- Messages
- 255
- Likes
- 149
Hi everyone, I’ve had my F226Be for some time and love them, but I want to give them to my parents as a retirement gift.
I’m trying to decide which I should pick up to replace them.
I have two excellent subs (Rythmik F18) and my SHD for room correction, so I’m leaning towards an open box Kef r3 for $1300, but I hated them in the past, finding them dull and like something was missing. I suspect it was the off-axis performance since I’m guilty of drinking while slouching, often center-right instead of perfectly center.
Listening Room specs: small 10x13 feet room with a short 8-9 foot ceiling. Upstairs and doubles as my home office, so I think I’d like to go for bookshelves again. I sit about 7-8 feet from the speakers.
The use case is movies/TV, and music. Roughly 40/60 split favoring music listening. Stereo setup with subs, no Dolby/center, etc. Genres of music I listen to: rock, orchestral, electric, jazz, classical. Sometimes vocaloid and other related genres like Pop.
I was quoted or found the following:
M126be pair $2703.01 with tax
F206 pair - $2596.92 with tax
Kef r3 - $1200-$1400 used or open box
Kef r3 meta - $1850 open box
Ascend Sierra LX - $1500
Focal Kanta pair b stock - $4400 open box
My goal is not to get such a downgrade that I buy another pair of F226Be, which at best is $4000 open box so far.
I’ve owned the R3 in the past and disliked them, but that was before I had my subs or SHD for room correction. I loved my M105s, but the soundstage didn’t seem to fill the room like my F226Be; I genuinely cannot hear anything other than my music or TV when I listen to F226Be. However, when I had the M105s, I could hear noise from downstairs or my neighbors walking, as it didn’t fill the room the same way as F226Be. I made sure to use my Apple Watch to check the dB; sure enough, it’s still 68dB (my preferred listening volume). I suspect it’s due to the wide dispersion that Revel is known for, but I am unsure why the M105 didn’t fill the same. Is it due to the size or amount of drivers?
Cheers, and thank you all.
I’m trying to decide which I should pick up to replace them.
I have two excellent subs (Rythmik F18) and my SHD for room correction, so I’m leaning towards an open box Kef r3 for $1300, but I hated them in the past, finding them dull and like something was missing. I suspect it was the off-axis performance since I’m guilty of drinking while slouching, often center-right instead of perfectly center.
Listening Room specs: small 10x13 feet room with a short 8-9 foot ceiling. Upstairs and doubles as my home office, so I think I’d like to go for bookshelves again. I sit about 7-8 feet from the speakers.
The use case is movies/TV, and music. Roughly 40/60 split favoring music listening. Stereo setup with subs, no Dolby/center, etc. Genres of music I listen to: rock, orchestral, electric, jazz, classical. Sometimes vocaloid and other related genres like Pop.
I was quoted or found the following:
M126be pair $2703.01 with tax
F206 pair - $2596.92 with tax
Kef r3 - $1200-$1400 used or open box
Kef r3 meta - $1850 open box
Ascend Sierra LX - $1500
Focal Kanta pair b stock - $4400 open box
My goal is not to get such a downgrade that I buy another pair of F226Be, which at best is $4000 open box so far.
I’ve owned the R3 in the past and disliked them, but that was before I had my subs or SHD for room correction. I loved my M105s, but the soundstage didn’t seem to fill the room like my F226Be; I genuinely cannot hear anything other than my music or TV when I listen to F226Be. However, when I had the M105s, I could hear noise from downstairs or my neighbors walking, as it didn’t fill the room the same way as F226Be. I made sure to use my Apple Watch to check the dB; sure enough, it’s still 68dB (my preferred listening volume). I suspect it’s due to the wide dispersion that Revel is known for, but I am unsure why the M105 didn’t fill the same. Is it due to the size or amount of drivers?
Cheers, and thank you all.
Last edited: