- Joined
- Jun 19, 2018
- Messages
- 6,652
- Likes
- 9,406
Strange that they couldn't get the audio mixing right on their own video.
Indeed. They boast of 25 years of recording experience and obsessive attention to detail, yet the opening spoken word part is a horrible recording, hugely bettered by most youtube videos recorded on phones.Strange that they couldn't get the audio mixing right on their own video.
Indeed. They boast of 25 years of recording experience and obsessive attention to detail, yet the opening spoken word part is a horrible recording, hugely bettered by most youtube videos recorded on phones.
Did you analyse it to find that, or was that obvious to you from listening? I assumed it was a terrible acoustic and bad mic positioning, but playing with the balance I can hear it is more than that, one channel is louder than the other as well. Maybe it's an in-joke to see how many of their customers notice.I don't know how they've managed it, but what seems to be the problem is that they have the left channel leading the right channel by a few milliseconds (Haas effect). Definitely not deliberate - it's the last thing anyone would want to do to a mono speech recording.
Did you analyse it to find that, or was that obvious to you from listening? I assumed it was a terrible acoustic and bad mic positioning, but playing with the balance I can hear it is more than that, one channel is louder than the other as well. Maybe it's an in-joke to see how many of their customers notice.
Maybe the cameraman was sitting on the left channel micNot sure how they managed this. If it had been as simple as a stereo mic pair with the left channel mic closer, that might explain the time difference, but then the left channel would also have been louder.
Strange that they couldn't get the audio mixing right on their own video.
Mercedes Benz, Rolls Royce, Rolex, Memorex, Bugatti, Lammborghini, Ferrari, ...they exist because they are solid high preformance statement pieces for solid people with solid money looking for solid Hi end status.
I'm wondering if there is a market for expensive, bottled audiophile air for bluetooth and Airplay. Just open and release for better definition, clearer, highs, more resounding bass etc.
That's not really a good analogy.
People will generally admit that they buy expensive cars for the for the coolness factor or for a luxury interior coupled with high performance as opposed to bare bones high performance. Occasionally people will even admit that they buy them for the status. Nobody's afraid to admit they bought a Lambo or Ferrari instead of a Corvette because it's cooler and more luxurious even if the Corvette is faster and easier to maintain.
How often do people admit that they paid considerably extra for measurably equivalent or often inferior gear just because they though it looked cooler or were impressed by it's immaculate fit and finish? They almost always insist that they bought it because it sounds better, not because they like Nice Things and have money to burn.
If both the buyers and sellers of this this kind of stuff would just admit to themselves that these products are basically just luxury squared then these kind of threads wouldn't generate the endless chorus of WTF which they currently elicit.
@ $130 a pair I take two. @ 130K a pair I take only one.
* They are very nice. They would match my decor and artistic flair perfectly.
I've often wondered how people cope with such heavy speakers in the real world, do they just stay where your dealer puts them until you sell them?https://www.stereophile.com/content/sonus-faber-aida-loudspeaker
Some pretty floor standing speakers for $130 a pair. Since they weigh 364 lbs each, they are a real deal, by the pound. I wonder how these would stack up next to a $9k Goldenear Reference. You would have enough left over for a Porsche 911.