Any truth to this ? Not that it would matter, there is no relevant content above 20kHz, but still?
Dunno. In one of the screenshots of the frequency response, one of the files had significanlty higher noise floor above 20kHz, but it was not possible to see the scale.
He did seem to answer all the questions we'd normally ask about controls, and we know that filters can impact FR at 20kHz and above.
If your hearing extends up or beyond that level then perhaps it is audible - and if his test has been correctly carried out as described, he has proven that he can hear it.
However his video contradicts his clickbait title.
1 : Even under the test conditions the result doesn't matter.
especially given how high a frequency it is most people
are probably not going to be able to
hear and those that can are probably
going to find that it's too small a
difference for them to care about anyway
2 : He's not testing a difference between DACs, but between filters. It is often been pointed out that if you use a filter which impacts the FR in the audible range that this will be .... audible. In this case the filters are making changes in (his) audible range - which would not be the case for the vast majority of people. We normally (often unspoken) mean that DACs are indistinguishable when they are using similar performing filters. Most Dacs default filters are of similar performance.
So here he has two edge cases combined. One is a person whose hearing extends above the range of the vast majority of people. Second - he is comparing two filters - one of which is not used in the vast majority of DACS which creates a difference in his higher than normal frequency range.
I'm not sure it is a result that has any significant impact for the premise of this thread.