One exception would be if you were using it to connect a passive volume control or an odd device with very high output impedance. Then the shorter the better.
Many. The conclusion is that there is no degradation in the signal if the interconnect is short. Short, in this context, means less than a few hundred meters. ASR hasn't done them, if that's what you're asking, because it's a somewhat silly test once you understand the engineering end of things.Has there been a test where let say a 1.5 meter RCA was compared to a 0.5 meter rca?
Has there been a test where let say a 1.5 meter RCA was compared to a 0.5 meter rca?
So there is a difference between a .5 kilometer vs a 1.5 kilometer cable.Maybe no, but some longer ones have been tested, I suppose...
From my DAC manual:
View attachment 28280
OMG, at those lengths, even a "cheap" cable would break the bank!So there is a difference between a .5 kilometer vs a 1.5 kilometer cable.
If you are in the EU, Thomann has great cables: the sssnake, Pro Snake and Cordial for example.Belden, Mogami, Canare are good cable manufacturers and produce detailed specs. Some pro shops offer their products.
Check out Blue Jeans Cable as well.
Using different cable lengths will definitely (and measurably) change the frequency response when you use them to connect an MM cartridge to the phono preamp input, due to the change in capacity (too much capacitive load leads to a resonance in the highs followed by a steep low pass filter, too little capacitive load leads to a slight reduction in the highs). But I totally agree that this is the only situation where it will be audible.[..]In practice, with the same type of cable there will be measurable differences with a 100% certainty.
I can show this even with a cheap LCR meter and or a craze expensive TDR.
Will these differences have any consequences for an audio signal ?
I say NO, others will say yes.
Not with the lengths you mentioned though.
Yes, and it is a complete riddle for me why the industry did not incorporate the RIAA preamp into the turntables. That would also make it easy to go balanced from the cartridge to the preamp's input, and the famous ground screw could have been avoided completely. External cable type and length would no longer matter. Now it's too late, I will not waste my time to mod my two Duals anymore...
True, my kids deck have both included RIAA amp and ADC to USB. The SONY PS-LX300USB. Not a great one but good enough for my modest record collection.Some cheaper decks have built-in RIAA amps these days as often integrated amps don't have RIAA pre-amps anymore.
Maybe it is because audiophiles, just like they want to choose which cartridge they use, like to be in control of which phono pre-amp they would like to use.
Some cheaper decks have built-in RIAA amps these days as often integrated amps don't have RIAA pre-amps anymore.
For most practical purposes those two lengths are the same. But there can be differences between a 1 meter and a 10 meter RCA cable. This is one of Bill Whitlock's pet peeves.Has there been a test where let say a 1.5 meter RCA was compared to a 0.5 meter rca?
Linn offers the Ulrika phono stage for putting into the LP12 (I wouldn't pay the price though), and AFAIR long ago Naim did the same (for the LP12).Yes, and it is a complete riddle for me why the industry did not incorporate the RIAA preamp into the turntables. That would also make it easy to go balanced from the cartridge to the preamp's input, and the famous ground screw could have been avoided completely. External cable type and length would no longer matter. Now it's too late, I will not waste my time to mod my two Duals anymore...