• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

47Hz room mode woes...

sam_adams

Major Contributor
Joined
Dec 24, 2019
Messages
1,043
Likes
2,610
Last edited:
OP
N

nvidia_7

Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2024
Messages
65
Likes
67
Nope. Eg Neumann MA1, dito Genelec GLM. MIC at 90deg. See also REW instruction. Yes both have their purpose but here I would also measure at 90 deg.

Still doesn’t explain the wavy HF response. My bet. Put the speakers on stands.
This is what I get with them off the desk and sitting on a stand. To my eyes this looks much better, a downward slope as you'd want for in room response.
 

Attachments

  • offdesk.png
    offdesk.png
    277.7 KB · Views: 74

Daverz

Major Contributor
Joined
Mar 17, 2019
Messages
1,325
Likes
1,497
Nope. Eg Neumann MA1, dito Genelec GLM. MIC at 90deg. See also REW instruction. Yes both have their purpose but here I would also measure at 90 deg.

Still doesn’t explain the wavy HF response. My bet. Put the speakers on stands.

From the REW "Getting Started" guide:
  • A tripod to support the mic or meter (hereafter just called "mic"). Small movements of the mic can result in large variations in the measurements, for repeatable results a means of supporting the mic for a prolonged period is essential. For low frequency measurements (below a few hundred Hz) the mic can be set pointing straight up. This avoids having to move it to measure different speakers and makes it easy to read the display on a meter. Use a "90 degree" mic calibration file if pointing the mic upwards. To make measurements at higher frequencies it is best to point the mic directly at the speaker being measured. Use a "0 degree" mic calibration file in that case. In both cases the mic should be placed at ear height in your usual listening position.
 

HarmonicTHD

Major Contributor
Joined
Mar 18, 2022
Messages
3,326
Likes
4,846
This is what I get with them off the desk and sitting on a stand. To my eyes this looks much better, a downward slope as you'd want for in room response.
Yep. Much much better.

Now EQ out the LF peaks and all is well.
 
OP
N

nvidia_7

Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2024
Messages
65
Likes
67
From my short time reading, it would appear that putting speakers directly on a hard surface such as a desk causes "comb filtering", as the FR measurements I saw matched mine almost perfectly. That makes the idea of "desk speakers" a non-reality.
 

MaxwellsEq

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Aug 18, 2020
Messages
1,845
Likes
2,812
From my short time reading, it would appear that putting speakers directly on a hard surface such as a desk causes "comb filtering", as the FR measurements I saw matched mine almost perfectly. That makes the idea of "desk speakers" a non-reality.
That's always been the case with speakers on a desk, but for some installations it may be the only choice.
 

AudioJester

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Forum Donor
Joined
Jan 7, 2020
Messages
965
Likes
1,301
Whats the crossover point with the sub?
First simple step may be turning down the sub and/or moving it.
 
OP
N

nvidia_7

Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2024
Messages
65
Likes
67
Ok, just want some input on my current progress in getting these lsx ii's dialed in. The top graph in red is the before, and the bottom graph in blue is where im at currently. This is with a KEF Kube 10b, which I have no ability to EQ. My first question is, if I get a sub such as the Arendal 1723 1s which has a 7 band PEQ, would that help me to get rid of the 47.5Hz mountain? Or would it affect too much of the nearby frequencies? And secondly, how is my overall FR looking?
 

Attachments

  • update.jpg
    update.jpg
    275.4 KB · Views: 42

DVDdoug

Major Contributor
Joined
May 27, 2021
Messages
3,092
Likes
4,081
which has a 7 band PEQ, would that help me to get rid of the 47.5Hz mountain? Or would it affect too much of the nearby frequencies?
With parametric EQ you should be able to adjust the center-frequency and width of the filters. The width may be listed as "Q", where a higher Q is narrower. You should be able to make a dramatic improvement, although you don't usually get "ruler flat" results.

..And, you might LIKE a little bump-up in the bass! ;) If you listen at low volumes you might "need" a bump in the bass.
 

Sokel

Master Contributor
Joined
Sep 8, 2021
Messages
6,388
Likes
6,537
One thing I noticed is that the umik-1 shows 15dB less sound than my stand-alone dB meter. Maybe my mic is defective?
So,your sweeps are at 90db?
That may not be nice for those speakers,try (much) lower.

You can also calibrate your mic againt your SPL meter,use REW's SPL tab,is easy.
 
OP
N

nvidia_7

Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2024
Messages
65
Likes
67
So,your sweeps are at 90db?
That may not be nice for those speakers,try (much) lower.

You can also calibrate your mic againt your SPL meter,use REW's SPL tab,is easy.

I feel that my SPL meter may be off, as my iphone 15 pro max and the umik-1 measure within 1db of eachother. My iphone reads 76dB and the umik-1 reads 75dB. Volume is only at 63 when doing the sweeps to reach what the umik-1 is saying 75dB is.
 

nerdemoji

Active Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2023
Messages
195
Likes
310
I feel that my SPL meter may be off, as my iphone 15 pro max and the umik-1 measure within 1db of eachother. My iphone reads 76dB and the umik-1 reads 75dB. Volume is only at 63 when doing the sweeps to reach what the umik-1 is saying 75dB is.
might be a db weighting thing. I would trust the umik especially if you calibrated it
 

Sokel

Master Contributor
Joined
Sep 8, 2021
Messages
6,388
Likes
6,537
I feel that my SPL meter may be off, as my iphone 15 pro max and the umik-1 measure within 1db of eachother. My iphone reads 76dB and the umik-1 reads 75dB. Volume is only at 63 when doing the sweeps to reach what the umik-1 is saying 75dB is.
You're ok then,no need to calibrate.
The way I read it was that you did the sweeps super loud and the iPhone showed 90db and REW showed 75db but I probably got confused.
 
OP
N

nvidia_7

Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2024
Messages
65
Likes
67
You're ok then,no need to calibrate.
The way I read it was that you did the sweeps super loud and the iPhone showed 90db and REW showed 75db but I probably got confused.

Something else ive noticed though is that listening to music, around 51 on the volume is all I can handle before I think "this is too loud". Using my iphone it shows an average dB of 67 and peaks of 74dB.
 

nerdemoji

Active Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2023
Messages
195
Likes
310
Something else ive noticed though is that listening to music, around 51 on the volume is all I can handle before I think "this is too loud". Using my iphone it shows an average dB of 67 and peaks of 74dB.
What are you defining as a peak? Is it instant like a drum, or a loud section? At least in my experience iphone doesn't show me peaks (as in a drum) properly
 
OP
N

nvidia_7

Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2024
Messages
65
Likes
67
What are you defining as a peak? Is it instant like a drum, or a loud section? At least in my experience iphone doesn't show me peaks (as in a drum) properly

Not sure how the app is defining peak, I use the pro version of dB Meter.
 

Sokel

Master Contributor
Joined
Sep 8, 2021
Messages
6,388
Likes
6,537
Not sure how the app is defining peak, I use the pro version of dB Meter.
There's basically three numbers you must look at.
Average,max and peak.
The first two are usually A or C weighted and peaks are Z weighed.

If you want to take a good look of how they work and see your actual peak,use REW's logger,is under the SPL tab and it looks like this:

logger.PNG

Purple is Average (s),yellow is Max and Red is the peak.
 
Top Bottom