• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Danny at GR getting bad Talk Back from many of his viewers

amirm

Founder/Admin
Staff Member
CFO (Chief Fun Officer)
Joined
Feb 13, 2016
Messages
44,837
Likes
243,258
Location
Seattle Area
Thank you for pointing out the mistake!

:facepalm: This is the second time that I have confused cardioid dipole with dipole cardioid (also in the OB pitfall thread).
:facepalm: I'm probably at the age now where I need a counselor to take away my keyboard when I write such nonsense.
You know so much about the topic that any mistake is completely forgotten.
 

Rick Sykora

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jan 14, 2020
Messages
3,661
Likes
7,425
Location
Stow, Ohio USA
As I went to do some soldering recently for another project, I realized that Danny’s mods almost always require soldering (certainly any that adds tube connectors). Soldering is not a skill that many folks (notably younger ones) have. If so, this likely severely limits the market for these upgrades. If you are not skilled at soldering, you may just create a bigger mess than you are fixing. It is even less likely that most folks are equipped to verify a suggested mod was done correctly…

So my Loki analogy may have more merit than I originally thought. These upgrades are likely just fodder to supply a constant stream of content so Danny has something to sustain his youtube audience and revenues. If so, this upgrade stuff is all about maintaining an illusion of being a speaker savior for the masses. In this scenario, it does not matter whether the upgrades are technically robust, just good enough for serving up his promised weekly sermon. It is more about the brand and his reputation. He can ignore us and with the public’s short memory, simply move on to the next (likely) trumped-up example of how other vendors are shortchanging audio consumers. Stay vigilant!
 
Last edited:

IPunchCholla

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jan 15, 2022
Messages
1,125
Likes
1,413
As I went to do some soldering recently for another project, I realized that Danny’s mods almost always require soldering (certainly any that adds tube connectors). Soldering is not a skill that many folks (notably younger ones) have. If so, this likely severely limits the market for these upgrades. If you are not skilled at soldering, you may just create a bigger mess than you are fixing. It is even less likely that most folks are equipped to verify a suggested mod was done correctly…
As someone unskilled at soldering and using DIY to learn about circuits, I was just thinking about this yesterday when I finished-ish a project. I briefly considered how I could measure the device to see just how much my bad soldering job degraded the signal, but decided to just move on as I’m not planning on using the project for anything other than education and skill building.

Previously I did build custom crossovers for an old set of speakers. Again mostly for educational reasons. I did before and after measurements and my crossovers did measurably better than the old ones, smoothing the frequency response and gaining me about 5dB in headroom for my PEQ. No change in distortion. But I couldn’t really hear a difference.

So I guess I’m wondering, given your comment, just how bad a soldering job would have to be to have audible degradation without causing the circuit to fail?
 

Rick Sykora

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jan 14, 2020
Messages
3,661
Likes
7,425
Location
Stow, Ohio USA
As someone unskilled at soldering and using DIY to learn about circuits, I was just thinking about this yesterday when I finished-ish a project. I briefly considered how I could measure the device to see just how much my bad soldering job degraded the signal, but decided to just move on as I’m not planning on using the project for anything other than education and skill building.

Previously I did build custom crossovers for an old set of speakers. Again mostly for educational reasons. I did before and after measurements and my crossovers did measurably better than the old ones, smoothing the frequency response and gaining me about 5dB in headroom for my PEQ. No change in distortion. But I couldn’t really hear a difference.

So I guess I’m wondering, given your comment, just how bad a soldering job would have to be to have audible degradation without causing the circuit to fail?

Really is a broad question as you could use too little solder, too much solder, too little heat, etc. If the solder joints seem mechanically solid and the test for zero resistance, can be pretty sure they are not going to affect the sound. Loose joints can cause distortion and of course open connections are likely to have obvious audible issues with frequency response. Cold solder joints can add resistance and might be more difficult to detect. These problems would be easier to hear with test tones if you do not have a mic. Even better if you have some known baseline to use or compare one speaker with another.

Hope this helps a bit. Am sure there are more details available on the web for testing solder connections. Have not checked though so if you look and still have questions, let me know. :)
 
Last edited:

amirm

Founder/Admin
Staff Member
CFO (Chief Fun Officer)
Joined
Feb 13, 2016
Messages
44,837
Likes
243,258
Location
Seattle Area
That's a good point. Soldering is even harder when dealing with these high thermal mass components in a crossover. You need to have the proper soldering iron, tools and techniques to do it right. I have actually had speakers sent to me that came from factor with cold solder joints and such that had become disconnected!
 

Rick Sykora

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jan 14, 2020
Messages
3,661
Likes
7,425
Location
Stow, Ohio USA
Another example of why you should not trust Danny's measurements. However, this one appears to be from a supplier although is posted to the GR website...
LGK_Frequency.jpg

Since Amir's ugly measurements exposed the LGK 2.0, there has been a concerted GR effort to repurpose this (supposedly full range) driver. Here is the quote from the driver webpage "The frequency response is very smooth and the spectral decay is exceptionally clean. The vocal range is very clean and natural rivaling any driver. The highs are also very smooth with no harshness, ringing, or break up." Once you look the frequency response plot, it is wholly unbelievable that these claims could be for this driver.

There is now both a 2-way bookshelf, center channel and a tower speaker promoting this allegedly "smooth" driver. While Danny's oversmoothed measurements hide this driver's nasty resonances, the above shows one clearly at 2 kHz (right in the middle of where our hearing is most sensitive). It also starts to get ugly again around 8 kHz. While claims are made of exceptional clarity, these resonances can only result in exceptionally poor performance. Buyer beware!

p.s.

The repurposing of the LGK driver has been to mate it with a 5 inch woofer that has no posted specs/measurements and looks like a clearance sale driver from the days of tube tv's. See for yourself...

Blank-1000-x-1000-copy-5.png
 
Last edited:

restorer-john

Grand Contributor
Joined
Mar 1, 2018
Messages
12,839
Likes
39,422
Location
Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
He’s still using a circa 1998 Clio PCI card based measurement system running on a 486. And a VGA cable connecting to the CRT monitor.

It's his main gaming rig for Need For Speed, Doom II and Legend of Zelda.

I'd always thought the early Clios were ISA, not PCI. Danny must have a 'modern' one- probably running that new OS, Win98...

1702282095368.jpeg
 
D

Deleted member 48726

Guest
Danny's getting so much beef he's forgotten what hunger feels like..
 

Rick Sykora

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jan 14, 2020
Messages
3,661
Likes
7,425
Location
Stow, Ohio USA
Ok, I’ll share as I plugged my nose, muted the sound and used closed captioning…

This latest Jamo video appears to be an rehash of the first one. Maybe why he called it Round 2 although is the third post. The second one was misleadingly claimed it was about resolving the earlier issues. In this one, Danny simply leaves out the ugly output mismatch from the earlier one. Looks to have been done to allow him to claim he fixed enough to post the upgrade kit.
 
Last edited:

fpitas

Master Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jul 7, 2022
Messages
9,885
Likes
14,245
Location
Northern Virginia, USA
Danny really cannot tell what sort of ”defect” he may be “fixing”.
Oh, he knows. The viewers' money is not in Danny's pocket...yet.
 
D

Deleted member 48726

Guest
Ok, I’ll share as I plugged my nose, muted the sound and used closed captioning…

This latest Jamo video appears to be an rehash of the first one. Danny simply leaves out the ugly output mismatch from the earlier one. Looks to have been done to allow him to post the upgrade kit.

I watched it too. And it's clearly made so he can sell his "upgrade" kit for it again.
 

Mart68

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Mar 22, 2021
Messages
2,750
Likes
5,234
Location
England
Ok, I’ll share as I plugged my nose, muted the sound and used closed captioning…

This latest Jamo video appears to be an rehash of the first one. Danny simply leaves out the ugly output mismatch from the earlier one. Looks to have been done to allow him to post the upgrade kit.
His accent is the best thing about his videos.

I did watch the first ten minutes and he does talk some sense until he gets into criticising the brass binding posts, use of steel screws, and that the inductors are only glued to the board and could 'fly off' - and then I started losing interest.
 
D

Deleted member 48726

Guest
His accent is the best thing about his videos.

I did watch the first ten minutes and he does talk some sense until he gets into criticising the brass binding posts, use of steel screws, and that the inductors are only glued to the board and could 'fly off' - and then I started losing interest.

And that he can't tell the difference between metal (magnesium) and plastic cone on the Seas Excel driver..
 

MAB

Major Contributor
Joined
Nov 15, 2021
Messages
2,167
Likes
4,904
Location
Portland, OR, USA
And that he can't tell the difference between metal (magnesium) and plastic cone on the Seas Excel driver..
He can't even do his own research:
The woofer is a 6 1/2 inch cone driver in a vented enclosure, with the port on the rear of the cabinet. Formed of die-cast magnesium (very light and rigid), the cone is suspended by a natural rubber surround. Instead of the usual dust cap, there is a solid copper phase plug (resembling the front of an artillery shell or missile) extending forward from the center of the woofer's magnet structure. According to the manufacturer, the advantage of this feature is improved efficiency and more effective removal of heat from the magnet system. The woofer frame is also made of die-cast magnesium, which is said to provides superior rigidity and better control of the speaker's magnetic field than other materials.
He makes a big deal out of the OEM drivers supplied by Seas, just shows he has no idea what he is talking about. The frames look like the cast frames on early Seas Excel drivers, (non-magnetic so he should be happy, right?) The cones are magnesium, just like Seas made them. I watched him flailing the wires around worried about all sorts of things, did he ever address dry ferrofluid in this video?
If he learns anything, perhaps he could start marketing GR Research ferrofluid upgrade for old speakers.
 
Last edited:

DLS79

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Forum Donor
Joined
Dec 31, 2019
Messages
795
Likes
1,045
Location
United States
Really is a broad question as you could use too little solder, too much solder, too little heat, etc. If the solder joints seem mechanically solid and the test for zero resistance, can be pretty sure they are not going to affect the sound. Loose joints can cause distortion and of course open connections are likely to have obvious audible issues with frequency response. Cold solder joints can add resistance and might be more difficult to detect. These problems would be easier to hear with test tones if you do not have a mic. Even better if you have some known baseline to use or compare one speaker with another.

Another important thing when it comes to solder, is getting the right type.
 
Top Bottom