I’m not smug, I’m descriptive.
Quotes:-
“Some members claimed the JBL 4367 is exuberantly expensive, but I proved that is not the case - because there is no other company which offers comparable loudspeaker at lower price.”
“But...Have you ever seen how they (PA speakers) look??? Would you ever, and I mean EVER, place such ugliness in your living room?”
“where are the competitors, with equal sound quality (measurements), equally good/acceptable looking (for home use) and with much lower price? Well?”
“So, still there is no competitor with lower cost, comparable measurements and good/ acceptable/ tolerable visual appearance. Just look at the RCF 945-A with those handles...placing such a pair of pro boxes would be coyote-ugly in a living room would be double-coyote-ugly.”
“there are universally accepted aesthetic standards and some lines are not meant to be crossed...If (not), then much of the (text)books (artbooks?) from academies of art and design should be thrown away through the windows.”
“My eyes are hurt by this, sorry. And this is coming from a man who is in the pro loudspeaker business - designing, building, selling and renting big pro loudspeakers. I will have nightmares tonight...”
“My post was about undeniable truth that there are universally accepted aesthetic standards.”
”Oh really? (Posts supermodel pic and implies it must be liked by everyone)”
“JBL 4367 (has) no competitors…with the same qualities, but at lower cost.”
….and all the above haughtiness and mockery came crashing down when the JTR was mentioned and he had to admit it may be equal or better at a far, far lower price.
Why didn’t you throw your accusations at the one who actually was haughty, mocking, and overconfident? Perhaps you were too busy being on his ‘side’ re the price of this speaker, to forgive all the above? Then go on the attack as soon as someone accurately describes the above words? Come on.