ROOSKIE
Major Contributor
This an age old argument. The designs ultimate presentation can be made successful with either approach.That is the impression i made based on few cabinet resonance measurements available from Stereophile.
Where did that quote came from ? I'd like to read the full text.
If you search through the DIY forums there will be many conversations.
Here is one I found with a super quick search.
BBC-style thin-walled cabinets vs. tight bass? - Techtalk Speaker Building, Audio, Video Discussion Forum
Want a second or third opinion about your speaker cabinet design or other audio related problem? Post your question or comment on the Technical Discussion Board. Hundreds of technicians, engineers, and hobbyists, nationwide read and discuss electronics related questions each week. We welcome...
techtalk.parts-express.com
I suspect Harbeth begin using thin walls to save weight and save $ and not for other reasons. They became familiar with that approach, refined it well enough and have no reason to change. Now it is all marketing.
This is why I bet Buchardt uses thin walls, to save on international shipping.
Curving the cabinets is a very good approach and also deals well with internal standing waves.
Companies like REVEL and KEF use advanced laser examinations to build cabinets properly braced. You can't really just throw weight and bracing at it as that can backfire and also lead to those 500lb Wilson things.
I made some speakers in concrete enclosures and they vibrated like crazy. I was very easy to feel vibration on the walls, however I don't know if it was audible. But at the time it took me by surprise.
You can also end up channeling the cabinet vibrations back to the driver and driver basket if the cab is to ridged. That is not good and I think one of my designs has this issue a little bit but again I can't isolate in a way to determine an audible problem.
Obviously, some other person with more knowledge than myself may chime in with better info.