NorthSky
Major Contributor
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2016
- Messages
- 4,998
- Likes
- 945
It's well explained here:
Excellent. And for the previous four from that "Motion" series:
It's well explained here:
Is this a 23.976fps vs 24fps issue on your TV? Or is it the motion blur from shooting at 23.976, which is low but gives cinema part of it's look. Some panning shots will look bad when correctly presented because of the frame rate they were shot at, that's just how it is.
Finally, an excuse to get that 300' diagonal screen!
Honestly, I have found the upscaling to 4k for lower res sources to be it's best feature, even though I also like 4K HDR/Dolby Atmos when it appears on my OLED. I therefore surrendered to 4k. It's nice having computer monitors that are completely smooth and colorful.
I suppose, the question is how much better is 8k scaling from 4k scaling?
Is this a 23.976fps vs 24fps issue on your TV? Or is it the motion blur from shooting at 23.976, which is low but gives cinema part of it's look. Some panning shots will look bad when correctly presented because of the frame rate they were shot at, that's just how it is.
Anyway, the problem with todays panels when playing movies is poor motion handling and not the resolution.
It's the TV, the refresh rate...eg.; 60Hz, 120Hz, 240Hz, 600Hz