I'm trying to make sure that I understand your point. I think you are saying that music, for you, is only for when you need to block out noise around you or to facilitate a social gathering, but when alone you don't turn to listen to music and are a proponent of enjoying nature instead. So time alone best not spent listening to music with either speakers or headphones. That is how what you said reads to me, is this correct?
I was replying to 671's post directly above mine, and trying (unsuccessfully) to justify comparing corded and cordless headphones. Users of wireless headphones place importance on the lack of annoying cables. Wired users tend to prefer its sound quality. Sony JP did a social media campaign last year to see which side wins.
To add the necessary detail - music on wireless headphones are generally recommended to block out noise in a workplace (if allowed), during commuting or flights, where it gets repetitive or dull, but not social gatherings - unless you choose to!
I went wrong here: the only time music is necessary (implies that at other times it is optional, but then some people don't need to block out noise so this is wrong) is during commuting or some other mass gathering of people (this language was meant to cover living rooms, workplaces and so on where concentration is required but it is a poor choice of words). If you're by yourself, the luxury is to not need to wear any audio devices on yourself and be able to enjoy nature (one can be alone indoors or outdoors, here it is referring to outdoors but this isn't made explicit; who determines what luxury is - it could be silence or it could be enjoying music free from cables).
As a matter of personal opinion, there is no sound better than 'silence'. This doesn't mean one shouldn't choose to listen to music because it wouldn't constitute the best use of time. The words used probably reflect the fact that I live right next to a very busy road - it's like living on a seashore but way worse! I know some Japanese people who live 1-2 metres from a railway track, but that sound is intermittent, not constant. So, I assumed that people who can only get 'silence' at a time past midnight will really appreciate being outdoors to tend to a garden, go for walks and exercise, while listening to the sound of the wind, or birds. I also tend to think that headphones and earphones will cause damage to hearing anyway, since they tend to get turned louder in order to get that high quality detailed sound, or when you're outdoors to drown out ambient noise.
Frank Dernie replied saying that he uses speakers and so he bypasses the wired vs wireless issue. I also find the real deal is always with speakers. That said, my speakers are average and being in a unit, one can only use them rarely to avoid affecting others' right to peaceful enjoyment.
Being a supporter of wired, the wireless market just doesn't seem to make sense. Or perhaps it's the frequent attitude and the way wireless users are seen as disengaged and unaware risk takers - prone to aeroplanes crashing on top of them or pedestrian traffic accidents? Or that there is less public transport commuting these days so the need for wireless is diminishing?