All things being equal at the 'pre-master' stage, vinyl reproduction will be technically more limited in transferring the recording accurately to disc(stylus tracking control EQ, inner/outer groove frequency performance} - plus there are issues related to the mechanical reproduction apparatus and the deficiencies of the vinyl substrate, e.g. spindle centring, form stability(warping), wear and material grain, to name a few.
Yeah, but...
Everything you said is true regarding the fidelity limitations of vinyl. No sane person would disagree.
But sometimes everything isn't equal. There are some shockingly bad to mediocre digital masters that, for whatever reason, have never been done well in the digital domain.
Case in point: Led Zeppelin remasters
Between Jim Page's oversight leading to ham-fisted EQ and the seemingly crap fidelity of the original master tapes, I haven't heard a very listenable digital version yet.
Which leaves the LP more appealing to me because the lower fidelity of the medium help mask the flaws, merging it all into a 'wall of sound', instead of bunch of distinct instruments that weren't mixed and EQed well enough to give any sense of imaging, soundstage, etc.
I'd put early Rolling Stones in the same bucket.