- Joined
- Oct 25, 2019
- Messages
- 11,133
- Likes
- 14,806
I bet he used X-Rays though, he didn't just root around where he sensed there might be some tooth damage.
I bet he used X-Rays though, he didn't just root around where he sensed there might be some tooth damage.
He was very science focused and was keen to show off all his latest pieces of equipment to the patients. Such a shame he passed away and was replaced with one who simply waxed on about his high-end hifi. Leaving the practice was an easy decision on my part.I bet he used X-Rays though, he didn't just root around where he sensed there might be some tooth damage.
I bet he used X-Rays though, he didn't just root around where he sensed there might be some tooth damage.
You always have the choice to ignore the thread.I love this kind of threads. The amount of backslapping is giving me a massage.
In no actual science that I know of there’s so much wit, energy and emotion congratulating themselves that they’re the anointed ones. People doing science usually get on with it and don’t talk about snake oil so much.
But sure, it’s fun. Like every economics class I took, which took pains to explain how economics was an actual science.
People doing science usually get on with it and don’t talk about snake oil so much.
Probably just the "Sam Harris" variety though.I think the neuroscientists will disagree.
A objectiviste is an audiophile who praises equipment he has never heard, a subjectiviste is a audiophile who praises equipment he has never measured.Having been kind of into it in the 80s and early 90s I disagree - If you went to a store or pulled a magazine off a rack, you were getting pretty subjectivist views.
Wait...Blue Jeans is high end now?I like the pragmatic Benchmark / Blue Jeans approach to selling high-end cables: They recognize that there comes a time to shut one's mouth, smile, and collect the money!
Serious foodies create recipes.That is a totally wrongheaded mischaracterization. Nothing could be further from the truth.
Objectivists and subjectivists both listen to equipment. Both of them want to tell other people what they heard, whether good or bad.
View it similar to describing the taste of food. The subjectivist uses words. The reader will be sure that the subjectivist tasted the food, and that they had a certain impression, but the reader has no idea whether they themselves would experience the same taste. The reason is that words are very poor at describing tastes relative to someone else's experiences.
The objectivist includes the recipe. Now the reader can experience the same taste, no matter where they are or what sort of kitchen they have.
Objectivists definitely listen to equipment, but they use tests and measurements the way a foodie uses a recipe ...... to transfer a much more accurate distillation of their experience to someone else.
Jim
Intelligently priced cables. No mention of cosmic ray blocking sheathing, just basic wire with a decent profit.Wait...Blue Jeans is high end now?
Oh, good. I was going to throw mine away if they were "high end" now.Intelligently priced cables. No mention of cosmic ray blocking sheathing, just basic wire with a decent profit.
I like to listen to music on my sound system. Audiophiles like to listen to their sound systems with music.A objectiviste is an audiophile who praises equipment he has never heard, a subjectiviste is an audiophile who praises equipment he has never measured.
Sounds kind of subversive, too. I picture myself furtively listening to forbidden equipment. Viva la horn!I like to listen to music on my sound system. Audiophiles like to listen to their sound systems with music.
I do like the “objectiviste” typo. Sounds better as a French adjectival noun. Nous sommes objectivistes!
I invested quite a few thousands in tubes (amps/etc). 100% objectivelyI like to listen to music on my sound system. Audiophiles like to listen to their sound systems with music.
I do like the “objectiviste” typo. Sounds better as a French adjectival noun. Nous sommes objectivistes!
I once did a free download of a 'pure silence' CD.Burn in signal... It is a free download though. It's snake oil but at least it's free snake oil.
In this case I see the house is on fire so for in-wall use speaker cable should be CL2 (up to 150W's and CL3 (up to 300W).I wanted keep the OEM-stereo stock but wanted an AUX-in (3.5mm) for a portable media player.
In this case, the audiophool was/is my car's stereo.
Most definitely, that would be the perfect time to change them!In this case I see the house is on fire