Focal seem to have quite the fanboy population. This is honestly quite bad for the price, when you consider the competition: Sweetwater has the 8340A only $200 higher and 8330A for $900 (can get a pair of those with a 7350A for the same price).
I mean, midrange full of resonances (probably from the port, as the woofer nearfield measurement is clean) including a wide hump around 1 kHz, an obvious directivity issue (that'll induce brightness in the mid field) that the resident audiophile population explains (which is not the same as "justify") with the house sound blurb that you see from B&W cultists, no builtin DSP and high midbass distortion.
You may think me extra harsh, but that's exactly because of Focal's size, something people were talking about: they
can do better engineering, but marketing and image is their priority. It's really like Dynaudio, in my opinion.
Focal has rather blinder-like focus on low distortion and the W cones are about the best out there. Truly brilliant cone design. Consider for a moment that these are nearfield monitors and 86dB per speaker at 1m is far louder than you'd be listening at most times, and clearly the distortion behavior is excellent.
What are you on about? The smaller and cheap Peerless in a 8030C does better at 86 dB.
In a way. My understanding is that they emphasize maintaining wide horizontal directivity more than anything. They aren't going to sacrifice wide directivity in the name of a slightly smoother crossover region with a big waveguide for instance.
When Revel manages to be wide while still using waveguides, you know it's only an excuse.
I'm amazed at the low bass distortion at 96 dB.
Eh? If you ignore H2, it's certainly quite good. In a comparison with the 8050B, it's clearly better in the deep bass, but a lot worse after (where it matters, because subwoofers exist).