That is something we should look into as well. It is a debate as some measurements lack an universal standard for comparison. You have to go to graphic presentation. A constant debate here.
100% agree, and is something I was shocked to come to the realization to when I got into audio, that there are so few standards and no big entity to codify any standard essentially.
Graphs would be perfectly adequate in absence of a consortium to create standards and such. Schiit Audio was a company who recently started providing such measurements for their devices, and a simply PDF link to the tests with graphs from an AP555 can be found on the product pages of their site. And is stated as such.
When people are presented with a few test for power output, distortion metrics of single-ended and balanced with precisely stated ohm dummy loads, power metrics at various loads, tone frequency used, other basics like crosstalk and such. That’s a far more satisfying situation than something like:
SNR: Better than 96db
Power: 600W
Case material: Metal
Color: Black
Any more information someone provides about their product (so as long as it’s not fallacious of course) is a good thing. It fosters good faith at the very least, and valuable information to someone at the very best (both manufacturer who now know more how their product performs, and an informed customer who can now make a better decision).
EDIT: I wanted to add, there are instances where providing such information can be detrimental. For instance if you brush up against users who are ardent science deniers. Where they doubt objective demonstrations as matters of fact. Who are never partial to being proven incorrect, and also who attest to be capable of feats we've determined to be beyond the realm of human possibility, and who also they themselves fail at demonstrating such ability when we put away measurement devices, and simply ask them to show us their ability under proper test settings (like folks claiming they can hear distortions -300db down, or people who claim to hear differences between all cables - but when asked for demonstration in controlled tests, they never fail to conjure an excuse like "The pressure impeded upon my performance", of course that such pressure conveniently never manifests itself as an excuse when the tests between products are sighted tests). To those people, measurements of nearly any kind come to them as an affront to basically who they are and they find scientific deduction a delusion (as if to indicate any progress in life could have been down otherwise). Thankfully these people never show themselves fully in the light, and are usually remnants in corners of comments sections for the most part.
So if that is your target demographic you want to appeal to - then I suppose measurements would be a waste of time. (But I sometimes ask those kinds of consumers to not look at power metrics on spec sheets for example, and simply lick their fingers and then touch the power lines to determine and 'feel' how much power an amp is capable of - since measurements from "machines" aren't something they find valid). Of course they laugh, in the same way I do to their oblivious nature that I am simply following their logic to it's end-game.
In reality, even subjective review outlets wouldn't have issues with more specification information from company sheets. As their subjective review will be subjective regardless. The only thing you have to gain is potentially newer customers who don't subscribe to some archaic mode of thinking as audio for a very large portion seems to STILL be afflicted by, but thankfully seemingly shifting toward better days.