• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Hi Res music

Musichead

Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2024
Messages
32
Likes
11
Hi Everyone

Would like your opinion on what do you prefer - Tidal… Qobuz…Apple for true Hi Res tracks?

Thanks
 

AdamG

Enjoy the Music your way…
Moderator
Forum Donor
Joined
Jan 3, 2021
Messages
4,772
Likes
15,839
Location
Reality
Hi Everyone

Would like your opinion on what do you prefer - Tidal… Qobuz…Apple for true Hi Res tracks?

Thanks
No preference opinions from me. But they all offer CD quality and above streams. So it all comes down to the features and functionality of their music app and their user interface and pricing. Select the one that has the features you want/like at the price you are willing to pay. Anything Cd Quality is pretty much all you need.
 
OP
M

Musichead

Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2024
Messages
32
Likes
11
What about master tracks? CD quality is good but not the highest quality you can get I’m told?
 

antcollinet

Master Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Sep 4, 2021
Messages
7,863
Likes
13,296
Location
UK/Cheshire
Hi Everyone

Would like your opinion on what do you prefer - Tidal… Qobuz…Apple for true Hi Res tracks?

Thanks
I'm not remotely interested in Hi Res given that it offers no audible benefits to Redbook/CD in real world listening.

If it's there I'll take it - but I'll not pay one penny for it. As pointed out by @AdamG choose your streaming service on other criteria.
 

antcollinet

Master Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Sep 4, 2021
Messages
7,863
Likes
13,296
Location
UK/Cheshire
What about master tracks? CD quality is good but not the highest quality you can get I’m told?
You're basically told wrong.

CD/redbook was very carefully designed to be transparent to human hearing. Pushing more data in there doesn't make an audible improvement.
 

Timcognito

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jun 28, 2021
Messages
3,585
Likes
13,478
Location
NorCal
Broken record here on Hi Res. I use Qobuz because of the music selections of Jazz, International, Acoustic, Classical are very good. It seems Iike Tidal, which I had for a year, had more contemporary, country, rap and rock stuff. Hi Res takes up more bandwidth and I live where internet providers are few so some buffering will occur on HR sometimes, not often, but annoying when it does .
 

AdamG

Enjoy the Music your way…
Moderator
Forum Donor
Joined
Jan 3, 2021
Messages
4,772
Likes
15,839
Location
Reality
What about master tracks? CD quality is good but not the highest quality you can get I’m told?
Have your hearing tested. As we age we lose hearing range. Mostly up high above 12K and up. So all that extra quality goes to waste because we can’t hear that high. Your profile says you are 63. So if you can still hear at 15k and above you are lucky, gifted or both. There are some hearing tests online that are free you just need headphones of relatively good performance. Here is an online hearing test I have used in the recent past:

 
OP
M

Musichead

Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2024
Messages
32
Likes
11
Broken record here on Hi Res. I use Qobuz because of the music selections of Jazz, International, Acoustic, Classical are very good. It seems Iike Tidal, which I had for a year, had more contemporary, country, rap and rock stuff. Hi Res takes up more bandwidth and I live where internet providers are few so some buffering will occur on HR sometimes, not often, but annoying when it does .
Thanks
You're basically told wrong.

CD/redbook was very carefully designed to be transparent to human hearing. Pushing more data in there doesn't make an audible improvement.
 

Count Arthur

Major Contributor
Joined
Jan 10, 2020
Messages
2,261
Likes
5,075
The Headphone Show recently did some feature comparisons you may find useful:



As others have said, I wouldn't pay extra for resolutions above CD quality, 16bit - 44.1kHz, it's almost certainly inaudible.
 

olieb

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2023
Messages
371
Likes
607
Would like your opinion on what do you prefer - Tidal… Qobuz…Apple for true Hi Res tracks?
I don't care for hi res for the aforementioned reasons. I use Apple for ease of use and the ability to play „albums“ more easily.
Several times I got frustrated too much and checked Spotify only to find it even more obnoxious with its algorithms, GUI and other "intelligent" functions. IRC I tried Tidal once (some years ago), I was not impressed either. So I am still on Apple.
 

OldTimer

Active Member
Joined
Nov 24, 2023
Messages
258
Likes
88
I use all three.
  1. Qobuz for general songs (Pop, Folk, Blues, Soul, and Country)
  2. Tidal for gospel/worship songs
  3. Apple for streaming at the homepod to airplay receivers.
 

Chrispy

Master Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Feb 7, 2020
Messages
7,985
Likes
6,122
Location
PNW
Biggest advantage to higher res is manipulation of the signal, if needed. For listening, perhaps if there's a particular difference in the recordings in the different resolutions?
 

BigFKahuna

Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2022
Messages
64
Likes
67
No one's mentioned Deezer yet. I find their quality to be very good.
I have been rather happy with Deezer for the past couple of years, and since it streams at Airplay 1 (not 2) it goes at CD quality. I understand that the ability to stream at hi res is not the same as the catalogue being all hi res, in fact maybe 10% or whatever of a streaming service such as Tidal or Qobuz actually is hi res? I do wish Deezer offered a Connect feature to my KEF system, but that is something for another thread.
 

Matt_Holland

Active Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2023
Messages
266
Likes
449
Amazon Music For me.
I had Tidal’s highest tier for many years courtesy of a work benefit, but when that stopped I switched straight to Amazon because it’s half the price and includes high-res. I stream direct from the Amazon app to my Wiim amp using Alexa Cast.
 

Miguelón

Active Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2024
Messages
250
Likes
124
Location
Vigo (Galicia, Spain)
Masters Hi-Res are way large a marketing maneuver to make you pay extra money, fortunately the tendency is to pay around 10-15 €/ month in many stream services. Tidal has changed its pricing offers to that interval. CD quality is enough to my ears and as far as I know to almost everybody. I cannot perceive over 15 kHz, 20 to 22 kHz filter band that is often used as passband on 44.1 kHz DAC filters is totally inaudible for me.

Personally I prefer Qobuz or Tidal, and I switch back and forth between them.
Qobuz has a better jazz and classic catalogue and is easier to find a concrete version by interpreter or authors, but playlists and suggestions are worse than Tidal ones (in my opinion).

I don’t know quality tests about MQA files, but at least for me are not good and sometimes I find them unrealistic on acoustic music. I red rumors that Tidal are changing gradually for FLAC files.

Apple music has barely no useful playlists, the app doesn’t let public sharing. Is for you this are important avoid this service. The only playlists you will find are Apple selections, and in my opinion they suck (to my taste). But their catalogue is quite extensive.
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom