Super interesting test! I previously followed some similar work my archimago on distortion.
Wondering if those >- 100db SINAD dacs make any difference at all after this....
Thanks! Just opened a poll.I did some similar distortion testing some years ago, which was really an eye opener. With music I found more or less the same thing as with this test: most kinds of distortion stops being noticeable fairly quickly, at least as long as one doesn't listen for it attentively. So I have long thought that a SINAD of 60 is usually more than enough, at least when it comes to distortion. Noise and hiss is a different matter.
Loudspeakers and headphones is where the important differences are.
Btw, @Pdxwayne : maybe it's a good idea to open a poll here? I suspect that the people who post their results will be those who do better than average, whereas others will refrain from posting...
Regarding -60 is enough or not, I guess it depends on the chain?I did some similar distortion testing some years ago, which was really an eye opener. With music I found more or less the same thing as with this test: most kinds of distortion stops being noticeable fairly quickly, at least as long as one doesn't listen for it attentively. So I have long thought that a SINAD of 60 is usually more than enough, at least when it comes to distortion. Noise and hiss is a different matter.
Loudspeakers and headphones is where the important differences are.
Btw, @Pdxwayne : maybe it's a good idea to open a poll here? I suspect that the people who post their results will be those who do better than average, whereas others will refrain from posting...
Regarding -60 is enough or not, I guess it depends on the chain?
Let's say a person get DAC, preamp, and amp that are all -60 and good enough individually.
Using http://www.sengpielaudio.com/calculator-coherentsources.htm to calculate the additive effect of distortion.
First -60 and -60 comes to -53.979
Add -53.979 to the third -60 and the cumulative is -50.457.
Looking at the distribution chart for the music distortion test results, it would seem certain small percentage of population out there might be able to sense a difference for ~-50.
Yeah, even Amir's original distortion thread didn't go that far. Not that many participants there either....That's true. I don't think there's any doubt that some people can hear a cumulative SINAD of 60 under the right circumstances. My point was that distortion 30 db down when playing music seems relatively ok to me, I really need to listen attentively to pick it out. Whereas frequency response and dispersion characteristics in loudspeakers, and room acoustics stuff like flutter echo etc, are things which are immediately noticeable, both to me and most other people. There's no harm in getting electronics with really low THD of course, but for me personally it doesn't matter that much anymore.
Anyways: off-topic over! The poll doesn't seem to get that many participants?
BTW, to me, your point about "distortion level -30 is good enough" is not off topic at all. I agree with you.That's true. I don't think there's any doubt that some people can hear a cumulative SINAD of 60 under the right circumstances. My point was that distortion 30 db down when playing music seems relatively ok to me, I really need to listen attentively to pick it out. Whereas frequency response and dispersion characteristics in loudspeakers, and room acoustics stuff like flutter echo etc, are things which are immediately noticeable, both to me and most other people. There's no harm in getting electronics with really low THD of course, but for me personally it doesn't matter that much anymore.
Anyways: off-topic over! The poll doesn't seem to get that many participants?
BTW, to me, your point about "distortion level -30 is good enough" is not off topic at all. I agree with you.
Just by looking at the music result chart, indeed for majority of people out there, -30 is more than enough. Spending more for more transparent chain unlikely to bring further benefits. Getting better speakers and fixing room issues are of more values.
Also, I noticed that when taking the tests, my sensitivity reduced fast after listening at good volume level for a short while. So, I assume -30 would also be enough for majority of people with more sensitive hearing, especially if they have been listening to music through out the day.
I can think of a certain scenario where a person would appreciate a more transparent chain:
*Have more sensitive hearing than majority of people
*Well rested and not exposed to loud noise for a while
*Listening to music critically for a short period ot time
*Listening to music where high clarity is needed to fully demonstrate it's potential for large 3d sound stage
Remember that SINAD includes both noise (N) and distortion (D). A very low noise floor is really important for sensitive IEMs.Instead we are flooded with dacs that improve sinad to below 110db....
Indeed, I am looking forward to minidsp competitions. I really hope to get something like SHD in the $500 range.Indeed no harm in getting better electronics. I just don't get why we there is not any real competition on products that do proper room eq. That's where the bigger gains are to be made.
Instead we are flooded with dacs that improve sinad to below 110db....
But yeah everybody has their own idea of what should be done in the end, including myself
Maybe ASR should start asking members to contribute to this and other tests. That way we can establish some standards just like with the preference curve for speakers maybe
Indeed, I am looking forward to minidsp competitions. I really hope to get something like SHD in the $500 range.
Yes, I want Topping's quality products with eq and sub crossover.+1
Thats exactly my point. Dac +pre-amp that includes room eq and sub crossovers. You add an ncore and you are done. Instead we get myriads of dacs. Topping needs to enter this game
That Tracy Chapman test is flawed, so any ABX results from it are null and void.I am glad you agree that the recording is crap. I had the same thought the first time I tried that a while back.
I thought that was in "-" mode and at the end of the song?That Tracy Chapman test is flawed, so any ABX results from it are null and void.
Were there any instructions in the test about what dB level to use? If not all of these results are probably invalid...I checked music distortion with AKG 371 and my phone again yesterday and found out that for that combination, softer volume is easier than louder. Louder, I got not much better than mean. Softer, I could get much better than mean, although still not the best.
Samsung Note 9 to AKG 371
View attachment 162777
The instruction was to use a comfortable level and don't change the level during tests.Were there any instructions in the test about what dB level to use? If not all of these results are probably invalid...
Whoa - I'm guessing you have a usb port located behind your left ear.with music on HD800:
View attachment 162037