- Thread Starter
- #101
That's why the protocol is open and public.
But, just to avoid any misunderstanding here: I'm not saying that your test is not valid in itself. The problem is rather with relying on these kind of tests for making absolute judgments about sound and audio equipment. Experimental psychological science (and psychoacoustics is a kind of psychology) has recently gone through a huge replication crisis. This means that a lot of the experiments that were done couldn't be replicated - meaning that the findings probably weren't real. Can we be sure that the situation is better in psychoacoustics?