So let me get this straight, the company offered to to reimburse customers who believed they were defrauded, the full purchase price? Is that correct?
But the plaintiffs argued that they could have gotten more if the settlement hadn't been approved. Right?
From the article: Among other things, the challengers had argued that the settlement’s payouts were insufficient based on how much they might have won at trial.
Looks to me that the folks arguing as much simply wanted some x-tra cash, in addition to whatever they actually spent. I would be embarrassed and ashamed to be associated with anyone acting in such a low-level grifting way. All for a freaking piece of plastic.
Yeah, MoFi was wrong in advertising. But give me a break. Imagine-- feeling so bereaved over a record, and so entitled, that not only did they want their money back, but also wanted an additional pound of flesh. Greed, even in such petty occasions, seems to have no limit. Pathetic behavior, IMO.
Oh well, I'm sure the attorneys are laughing at both parties.