I know this can be an interesting debate but is actually besides the point.
If you think it is besides the point, it shows you don't actually understand it.
I know this can be an interesting debate but is actually besides the point.
Transients are not ultrasonics.
That’s being dismissive.
Haha ok I get it, no more debating on this. Adios Amigos.
That makes no sense. Do you understand what "resolution" means? Analog signals have a limited resolution too.
My 15 IPS analog tapes throw shade on my 7.5 IPS tapes.
Both still have a resolution that is less than 16 bits
Which is more discrete:
Bits, or atoms of oxide?
Uh oh, soon we see the word "quantum" mentioned...
Haha. Some of the comments are genuinely good and some humorous. But for every naysayer to this particular topic or any debate for that matter, just saying NO without any exposition or just simply having a worn out rhetoric, doesn’t really advance the debate nor does it help in furtherance of understanding.
Haha ok I get it, no more debating on this. Adios Amigos.
That's a trick question. You can't have an oxide with fewer than two atoms.Which is more discrete:
Bits, or atoms of oxide?
That's a trick question. You can't have an oxide with fewer than two atoms.
Only if you have one hand clapping.Can I have binary without two digits?
Haha. Some of the comments are genuinely good and some humorous. But for every naysayer to this particular topic or any debate for that matter, just saying NO without any exposition or just simply having a worn out rhetoric, doesn’t really advance the debate nor does it help in furtherance of understanding.
Some of the companies will love to stick to what they already do and resist disruptive change as it entails cost and will also come out with all sorts of stuff to make you believe it is not really needed.
Some of the audiophiles and prosumers might love the gear, recordings, tapes, vinyls and the stuff you already have and I totally get that, it’s natural.
However, progress and technology are undeniable and inevitable, it is about time for better audio to become mainstream and the paradigms of audiophile tech to change.
Hopefully next 10 years will see some ground breaking stuff. I for one am excited to know more on new developments.
I for one am excited to know more on new developments.
The MQA compression algorithm doesn't encode anything in the source file above 48Khz - if there is something it's discarded as being irrelevant acoustically. Effectively, no MQA file is more than 18/96. There is no such thing as 24/192 MQA. At best it is 18/96 upsampled to 24/192.Of course MQA does support more than 96khz. Tidal has acoustic and classical albums coded at 192khz. But MQA has its limitations and is mired with debates and controversies about whether even it has higher bit information which to my mind is an existential question
Which is more discrete:
Bits, or atoms of oxide?