stopbeingalentil
Member
- Joined
- May 27, 2021
- Messages
- 29
- Likes
- 122
Beautiful words. Here is a mental image for you. Imagine Donald saying "smearing" with the same kind of tone he reserves for "Chiiiiiiina"
Beautiful words. Here is a mental image for you. Imagine Donald saying "smearing" with the same kind of tone he reserves for "Chiiiiiiina"
And you would be mistaken in that if you had read other things he says about us in other fora. Here is an example of his posts:(I did not see the post in question, but following you for a while, I do believe your civility...)
Guess I started it.I'm not a linguistics expert but to me, personally, it was very clear from how he worded things where evidence-based facts ended and his own opinion and interpretation began... I'm curious to learn what exactly you took offense with in that regards if you can quote it... at any rate I think there are worlds in between his rethoric and MQA's
omg....And you would be mistaken in that if you had read other things he says about us in other fora. Here is an example of his posts:
View attachment 132333
Obvious ties to SMSL/Topping? They have it in everything??? You think anyone saying that about me is an upstanding citizen?
What he quoted after that had nothing to do with "pushing DRM schemes." It was an email I sent to Bill Gates letting him know that we were trying to get our hardware ecosystem of players to be as good as Apple's which had seamless Fairplay DRM integration.
Goldeneye proceeds to more sensational conspiracy theories.
Adam took an initiative to call him and offer to have a new thread where I would NOT post (as to keep tensions low) and he could start over. He went and disclosed that call with his own spin as a nefarious thing to do:
View attachment 132336
So yeh, we are to hire more moderators so that the food fights that he created can continue. And that I better say nothing or else. We go out of our way to allow dissent in this forum and to have it toiled this way is in very poor form.
Net, net, while he did some good work, I consider GodenEye to be a bad actor here. We are providing incredible visibility and traffic for his videos and yet he brings nothing but disdain towards us. Keep your guard up. Don't believe him because he sounds calm and collected in his videos.
Oh? This is right at the start of your OP:I am not saying with certainty that MQA removed my files.
I did contact MQA prior to posting the video (and this post), but their reaction was to immediately have my tracks removed from Tidal, and to have the publisher remove all my content.
If that's the strongest criticism of OP, you're really reaching.For the most part GoldenOne has been true to the evidence and is objective. However some stuff which is not really relevant to the original topic(the how and why of the removal of the test files) are not exactly based on evidence and rely on guesses and feeling to form an opinion that's heavily implied. I think that's where it's a little too far. Could have been: Ok I'll take your word for it but would you provide.... or guide us ..... to test .....
? What? That's the point. I HAD nothing to be against GoldenOne(until post Amir showed just now).If that's the strongest criticism of OP, you're really reaching.
I think it was fair to point out the temporal correlation between him contacting MQA and his tracks being removed from Tidal. Also - unless he's outright lying - him saying that the publisher didn't respond to his request whether the take-down was requested by MQA is in fact a factual statement, which framed that context as a sort of closed bracket... personally, I'm fine with that, because it was very apparent to me what he intended to present as fact and what he didn't.Guess I started it.
I didn't take offense. It's that he talks about some of MQA's reply being carefully worded to be technically correct but not actually correct. And that MQA doesn't reply based on evidence.
For the most part GoldenOne has been true to the evidence and is objective. However some stuff which is not really relevant to the original topic(the how and why of the removal of the test files) are not exactly based on evidence and rely on guesses and feeling to form an opinion that's heavily implied. I think that's where it's a little too far. Could have been: Ok I'll take your word for it but would you provide.... or guide us ..... to test .....
There must be some ways that MQA agrees on right. And to my understanding any music will probably show the MQA is lossy and not as good as CD quality.
Then I don't understand what the point of your last few posts are. You seem to take issue with OP, accusing them of a double standard. But it's nitpicking over how something is worded to a silly degree. In the grand scheme of this discussion, it seems like an odd point to pick up on.? What? That's the point. I HAD nothing to be against GoldenOne(until post Amir showed just now).
Guess I just stepped in the muddiest water. Better not to be fully in. I'm out.
on the plus side: if that's what people - including, and especially Amir - pick on, one could deduct that the rest of his post was pretty darn solidThen I don't understand what the point of your last few posts are. You seem to take issue with OP, accusing them of a double standard. But it's nitpicking over how something is worded to a silly degree. In the grand scheme of this discussion, it seems like an odd point to pick up on.
Wasn't that the point Amir was trying to make?Then I don't understand what the point of your last few posts are. You seem to take issue with OP, accusing them of a double standard. But it's nitpicking over how something is worded to a silly degree. In the grand scheme of this discussion, it seems like an odd point to pick up on.
As mentioned above, I absolutely did not put "spin" on the conversation.Adam took an initiative to call him and offer to have a new thread where I would NOT post (as to keep tensions low) and he could start over. He went and disclosed that call with his own spin as a nefarious thing to do:
I don't understand why you are linking to a post of Amir's that quotes OP's original post. OP has clarified this point in his latest video. Can you add some more words to your post to clarify what your are trying to say here?Wasn't that the point Amir was trying to make?
https://www.audiosciencereview.com/...-music-on-tidal-to-test-mqa.22549/post-797246
noI don't understand why you are linking to a post of Amir's that quotes OP's original post. OP has clarified this point in his latest video. Can you add some more words to your post to clarify what your are trying to say here?
And you would be mistaken in that if you had read other things he says about us in other fora...(I did not see the post in question, but following you for a while, I do believe your civility...)