@Instar , I recently purchased a M10 and having low output issues as well connected to two JL subs. struggling with getting hte subs to even auto power on having to turn the volume way up. Im wondering if there is a software or hardware defect in several NAD products...
The NAD is yet another product that falls significantly short on its optimistic specifications.
View attachment 30846
View attachment 30847
It's worth about AU$599 on a good day.
But it costs, wait for it, AU$3999. That's absolutely hilarious. The Master's Series was never terribly good value, right from the very first ones back in 2002 or so. I see things haven't changed one bit.
Now that my review is published, I can say that the unit I tested met the power spec with no problem. I didn't measure A-weighted SINAD, but unweighted was 82dB under the same conditions, so meeting the 85 dB weighted spec seems more than likely.
If streaming is not your thing, this isn't the unit to buy. If it is... well... I bought it.
Check out the review in AudioXpress, which (in all due modesty) is much more comprehensive. Whether this is the right unit for you will very much depend on how you’re going to use it.Sorry if some of this is dumb or incorrect, but first post and I'm just trying to learn more about all of these measurements if anyone smarter than me can help.
I am considering the NAD M10 because I'm looking for a 2.2 solution with Dirac and Bass Management, and this has Dirac and Dirac Bass Control.
The miniDSP SHD looked interesting and measured well with a SINAD of 111 dB, and I was considering pairing that with a stereo purifi 1ET400A amp from VTV, but it may not get Dirac Bass Control, and also I have a home automation system that the NAD with BluOS will better integrate with. Further, I think the touchscreen on the NAD is something my wife would be able to use more easily than for example using Audirvana to stream to the miniDSP SHD and control via a separate app. If the NAD will be noticeably worse, I could still go that route though.
The NAD C658 looked like it measured pretty poorly, so that didn't seem like a contender. In particular, I believe the SINAD was measured by Amir around 90dB.
Looking at the hifinews measurements of the NAD M10, they appear to show the following for SNR and distortion:
A-wtd S/N ratio (Digital/Amplifier)111.7dB (0dBFs) / 82.5dB (0dBW)
Distortion (20Hz-20kHz, Digital/Amp)0.0003-0.018%/0.004–0.084%
My understanding is that SINAD is a function of SNR+D, so if we assume the measurements from hifinews as accurate, could we derive the SINAD for both just the pre-out and also for with the amplifier, and if so, how would that be done and what would the values be?
It seems that the amplifier section is adding a lot of noise for some reason even with it being nCore (111.7dB vs 82.5dB) so I was wondering if I didn't use the amp in the M10, but instead fed the pre-out to another amp such as the stereo purifi 1ET400A amp from VTV, if I would end up with a well enough measuring solution, albeit paying for an amp section I'm not using.
The other option would be the NAD M33, which VintageFlanker had posted the HFN lab report for as pasted below. Could the SINAD similarly be derived and what would the values be for the analogue and digital sources there?
The M33 appears to measure better, but if that is only due to the amp section performing better, I was contemplating if I could just pickup a M10 and add the purifi amp to the pre's to still get something that measures well, but costs less and just requires one more box.
Thanks in advance for any help or guidance on all of this stuff.
View attachment 75895
Check out the review in AudioXpress, which (in all due modesty) is much more comprehensive. Whether this is the right unit for you will very much depend on how you’re going to use it.
I will say that I bought the review sample, and knowing the limitations, I’ve been incredibly happy with the sound. The Dirac implementation is superb.
Ive owned both the NAD M10 (I returned it) and a minidsp SHD. Some things to consider:Sorry if some of this is dumb or incorrect, but first post and I'm just trying to learn more about all of these measurements if anyone smarter than me can help.
I am considering the NAD M10 because I'm looking for a 2.2 solution with Dirac and Bass Management, and this has Dirac and Dirac Bass Control.
The miniDSP SHD looked interesting and measured well with a SINAD of 111 dB, and I was considering pairing that with a stereo purifi 1ET400A amp from VTV, but it may not get Dirac Bass Control, and also I have a home automation system that the NAD with BluOS will better integrate with. Further, I think the touchscreen on the NAD is something my wife would be able to use more easily than for example using Audirvana to stream to the miniDSP SHD and control via a separate app. If the NAD will be noticeably worse, I could still go that route though.
The NAD C658 looked like it measured pretty poorly, so that didn't seem like a contender. In particular, I believe the SINAD was measured by Amir around 90dB.
Looking at the hifinews measurements of the NAD M10, they appear to show the following for SNR and distortion:
A-wtd S/N ratio (Digital/Amplifier)111.7dB (0dBFs) / 82.5dB (0dBW)
Distortion (20Hz-20kHz, Digital/Amp)0.0003-0.018%/0.004–0.084%
My understanding is that SINAD is a function of SNR+D, so if we assume the measurements from hifinews as accurate, could we derive the SINAD for both just the pre-out and also for with the amplifier, and if so, how would that be done and what would the values be?
It seems that the amplifier section is adding a lot of noise for some reason even with it being nCore (111.7dB vs 82.5dB) so I was wondering if I didn't use the amp in the M10, but instead fed the pre-out to another amp such as the stereo purifi 1ET400A amp from VTV, if I would end up with a well enough measuring solution, albeit paying for an amp section I'm not using.
The other option would be the NAD M33, which VintageFlanker had posted the HFN lab report for as pasted below. Could the SINAD similarly be derived and what would the values be for the analogue and digital sources there?
The M33 appears to measure better, but if that is only due to the amp section performing better, I was contemplating if I could just pickup a M10 and add the purifi amp to the pre's to still get something that measures well, but costs less and just requires one more box.
Thanks in advance for any help or guidance on all of this stuff.
View attachment 75895
I didn’t, but if there’s anything particular you’d like to see, I’d be glad to run it. The amps are more than adequate- the only reason to use a different power amp is to get higher power. At the moment, I have the pre outs connected to a 400 watt amp I’m reviewing, but when I send that back, I won’t feel like I’m missing anything sonically by going back to the built in nCore amps. Dead silent and absolutely clean.Thanks, I actually did buy the latest issue to read the review. Did you happen to measure the pre-out? If so, what page was it on or which figure was it in the review. I wanted to get a sense of if I could get better performance by using a different amp and using this as a pre-amp.
My aim is to use this for listening to 2-channel music streaming with room correction and base management, and there doesn't appear to be many competitors out there. I'm really trying to decide between the NAD solution or miniDSP SHD.
I didn’t, but if there’s anything particular you’d like to see, I’d be glad to run it. The amps are more than adequate- the only reason to use a different power amp is to get higher power. At the moment, I have the pre outs connected to a 400 watt amp I’m reviewing, but when I send that back, I won’t feel like I’m missing anything sonically by going back to the built in nCore amps. Dead silent and absolutely clean.
Definitely helpful in considering, thanks. Besides the digital input issues, for streaming, did you find your setup to be a significant upgrade from the M10?Ive owned both the NAD M10 (I returned it) and a minidsp SHD. Some things to consider:
1. Dirac bass control is not available on either currently. NAD has at least mentioned it will be at some point. minidsp has not stated either way.
2. The dirac user interface is better integrated with the M10
3. The SHD has more flexibility/user control with bass management (i.e. cross-over slopes, delays, ect.) this may be a moot point if dirac bass control becomes available
4. Roon is stable for me with the SHD
5. The user interface and design is really nice with the NAD M10, the SHD is old school in this regard
6. The digital inputs on he NAD are wonky and no fix was issued while I had the unit. Not sure if that has changed
7. I went with the SHD+March 502 stereo ncore amp +Roon which works out to nearly the same cost as a M10
Hope this helps....
I prefer roon for music management/streaming which makes the BluOS a moot point for me. I also like the range of cross-over slopes and frequencies and also the ability to adjust gain on the outputs with the SHD. The higher power output with my separate amp also gives me more flexibility with room size and speakers.Definitely helpful in considering, thanks. Besides the digital input issues, for streaming, did you find your setup to be a significant upgrade from the M10?
Thanks. Your review has me leaning toward buying the unit as I think it there really isn't anything else that get's me what I'm looking for. I have two setups I would be getting it for, and one of them I'd need more power, so was still interested in the pre-out measurement.
I think mostly I wanted to be able to compare the pre-out of the NAD M10 to the output of the miniDSP SHD done by Amir. In particular, I was interested in the SINAD and THD+N Ratio at around 2V output for 1kHz , and THD+N Ratio vs frequency response. Also did you see any ESS hump in the intermodulation distortion?
Thanks! Did you test the HDMI input, and if so, did that have the same issues as the spdif? Basically I'm using this mostly for streaming, which it sounds like works great, but also to output sound from a TV, which I could connect via HDMI or spdif.I can do those over the weekend. I didn't look for the ESS hump because, frankly, I think that it's unimportant from an audibility standpoint. I'm much less hung up on SINAD than Amir is, because (IMO) it lumps together too many different and unrelated things, and can and does get heavily weighted toward things which can't be heard. However, it's an easy measurement while I have things hooked up.
The streaming capabilities are absolutely wonderful. If only spdif worked properly...