• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Nordost SuperFlatLine Speaker Cable Review

Rate this speaker cable:

  • 1. Waste of money (piggy bank panther)

    Votes: 251 93.7%
  • 2. Not terrible (postman panther)

    Votes: 5 1.9%
  • 3. Fine (happy panther)

    Votes: 2 0.7%
  • 4. Great (golfing panther)

    Votes: 10 3.7%

  • Total voters
    268

Steve Dallas

Major Contributor
Joined
May 28, 2020
Messages
1,221
Likes
2,937
Location
A Whole Other Country
At least it can be run under the carpet. Probably still needs cable risers though. The kids could run their Hotwheels cars over the humps. ;)
 

theREALdotnet

Major Contributor
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
1,209
Likes
2,084
Yeah, we need to measure speaker impedance in a vacuum, just in case.

Few amplifiers can handle vacuum || 2.2µF, though.
 

kchap

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Forum Donor
Joined
Jun 10, 2021
Messages
588
Likes
577
Location
Melbourne, Oz
I found this surprising, too. A velocity factor of 0.9 is unusually large for a cable of this construction. But who knows?
I also found it surprising so I looked at a Dipole Calculator site. The calculator assumes a velocity of 95% the velocity of light:

1686921477196.png


Compare the actual Antenna length to the ½ wavelength.
 

kklarqvist

Member
Joined
May 9, 2023
Messages
8
Likes
10
Location
MN, USA
I tried to find some technical information on this cable, and found this in their brochure:

View attachment 292620

At least some info on capacitance (31.8 pF/m) and inductance (0.394uH/m). This would make 111.3 ohm characteristic impedance. Cannot see the resistance parameter. I doubt their promoted "propagation delay = 91% speed of light".
I have not voted, because I miss "0" option, "designed as opposed to laws of physics".
The numbers are approximately consistent 1/sqrt(31.8pF/m*0.394uH/m)~283mm/ns~94%c0 and looking at the picture suggesting mostly air dielectric 91% speed of light is probably about right and also the inductance and capacitance numbers. Using two separated enameled transformer wires would probably get you to 99% the speed of light. (transformer wire was what I used in my early setups before I 'upgraded' to zip-cord).
 

Philbo King

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
May 30, 2022
Messages
669
Likes
879
I definitely want a higher velocity factor. I don't want to wait around to hear my music.
The delay at C is around 1 nanosecond per foot. At 91% propagation that increases to 1.0989e-009 sec.

I'd hate to have to wait that extra 98 picoseconds to hear the music! It would just ruin the experience! LOL
 

Raticosa

Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2023
Messages
8
Likes
9
Location
Bologna, ITALY
Hahaha... another failure for Nordost... from a physical point of view, putting N conductors in parallel with a small gap between them and not twisting them makes the whole cable acting like a multiple loop antenna with N-1 loops, which can easily pickup the EMI environmental noise... same problem of "ground loop antenna" doubled for positive and negative conductors. So definitively a "food for fishes"...
 

phoenixdogfan

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Nov 6, 2018
Messages
3,351
Likes
5,299
Location
Nashville
I 'spose if somebody absolutely wants to run his cable under a rug, or glue it to a baseboard and paint over it so as to hide it, then maybe a flat cable would be useful, but Nordost or some other manufacturer has cheaper stuff than this that will obviously work every bit as well or perhaps even better at least for in wall use.
 

_thelaughingman

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jan 1, 2020
Messages
1,368
Likes
2,058
Such a fad product!! I work with similar copper wire flat line cable in a highly complex automation system and it's the most fragile, noisy and least reliable cable. Heck the only job the flatline cable does is to run from one power amplifier box to another to power some robots and it still fails 70% of the time.
 
Top Bottom