I know it has RSC that is an improved version to the original YPAO, but FIR?
That would be a huge surprise as I have never read anything about that anywhere. Got a link to the source info?
I know it has RSC that is an improved version to the original YPAO, but FIR?
That would be a huge surprise as I have never read anything about that anywhere. Got a link to the source info?
Thanks, but I read that before,and don't recall it talked about FIR being used.
Someone expressed disappointment that Marantz didn't include manual PEQ, that Yamaha did.YPAO - what that has to do with AV-10?
No need to, you can adjust what you want, where you want it, with either Audyssey or Dirac through their respective applications - and you get infinite control over the frequency of the adjustment... along with an effectively unlimited number of bands...Yamaha's manual PEQ is a lot better than the archaic Denon/Marantz GEQ. I thought they were going to implement it on the newer Marantz products based on some interview I saw with the Denon/Marantz spokesperson. I guess they didn't.
Very well said.....Sometimes I wonder if people need to worry so much about that last dB or two of smoothness in the bass, when we already know most people are much less sensitive to distortion in the low bass range in terms of both distortions and a few dB of fluctuations.No need to, you can adjust what you want, where you want it, with either Audyssey or Dirac through their respective applications - and you get infinite control over the frequency of the adjustment... along with an effectively unlimited number of bands...
So both these tools provide true parametric eq.... you just have to make a paradigm shift in terms of the interface involved.
Oh, interesting. I had thought this was a point of difference in favour of MultEQ-X.you can adjust what you want, where you want it, with either Audyssey or Dirac through their respective applications - and you get infinite control over the frequency of the adjustment... along with an effectively unlimited number of bands...
No, I am talking about Dirac's own GUI interface... you can pick any frequency and adjust it up (increase level) or down (decrease level) - and you can set as many of these points as you want... within the interface.Oh, interesting. I had thought this was a point of difference in favour of MultEQ-X.
So a set of filters derived on REW can be loaded into Dirac as an overlay, without losing Dirac’s correction curve EQ?
That is certainly a gross mischaracterization. The ability to import a .csv file is nothing particularly impressive and if you think you can do a better multi-point measurement with REW than Dirac...well, good luck.OK thank you. I see that as a lesser level of control.
cheers
Dirac can do it, without 3rd party software. Audyssey can do it, but you need to spend $200 on the X app. The $20 app can do to it too, but then you need to use 3rd party software such as Ratbuddssey and likely a few others, some are free, some may cost a few dollars.That would be pretty sweet. If Dirac cannot do it, then it offers a lesser level of control.
Did you read @dlaloum post#928? He described what you can do with DL, that's a lot of "control", less crude than manual PEQ.I think you are talking about pushing a target line up and down on a graph, then living with however close the software manages to track that target? I see that as crude.
So you prefer a 10 band "graphic equaliser" as opposed to being able to specify the specific center frequency being adjusted - and having dozens (if not hundreds) of potential adjustment points...I think you are talking about pushing a target line up and down on a graph, then living with however close the software manages to track that target? I see that as crude.
I feel like you aren't understanding how that interface works.Yes I did, and I read it as pushing the target line up and down on a graph.
You can do that with Audyssey, just use Ratbuddyssey to type in the numbers you want instead of pushing the target curve up and down. The only cost is $20 for the Multeq editor app, Ratbuddyssey is free.Thanks. Is there any way to online ‘play’ with the interface, or do you know of a good YT video walking us through it?
Because it’s a big expense, and I wouldn’t want to get a system that doesn’t suit my needs…
The filter design section in this one might be helpful:Thanks. Is there any way to online ‘play’ with the interface, or do you know of a good YT video walking us through it?
Because it’s a big expense, and I wouldn’t want to get a system that doesn’t suit my needs…