Serious Question: How can DAC's have a SOUND SIGNATURE if they measure as transparent? Are that many confused?

[Miguelón]

Honestly, this sort of thing is why you were suspected of being a troll

Honestly, this sort of thing is why you were suspected of being a troll.

Maybe, I don’t care so much what I consider to be, but I’m sad for making Pablolie to be angry. Was not my intention, I apologized to him on my answer to his reply…

 

[Jim Taylor]

Scientific method is no more than a method. The so called “conclusions” are in fact “hypothesis”. As a hypothesis cannot be verified by the method, just contradicted, it will be always a “belief”.
So science is a set of collective beliefs taken as universal truths.

Not necessarily true:

What is a Hypothesis - Types, Examples and Writing Guide

A hypothesis is a proposed explanation for a phenomenon. For a hypothesis to be a scientific hypothesis, the scientific method requires....

researchmethod.net

In a theoretical way, one thing that makes the scientific method very desirable is that no matter the person, one can ever have doubts of what is true or not, and the doubt is healthy for the method.

Theoretically, that is true. Theoretically, if I shot you in one foot with a 12 ga. shotgun and it hurt like hell, that does in no way prove that if I shot you in the other foot with a 12 ga. it would also hurt.

I really doubt that you want me to shoot you in either foot with a 12 ga. to see whether it would hurt ... right?

See? Some things go beyond simple "beliefs".

Jim

 

[Jim Taylor]

Can you prove there is no better method?

Can you prove that a person cannot walk on the surface of the sun?

Jim

p.s. - The tone of this whole discussion reminds me of freshman-year pseudo-intellectualism. (yawn)

 

[Miguelón]

Not necessarily true:

What is a Hypothesis - Types, Examples and Writing Guide

A hypothesis is a proposed explanation for a phenomenon. For a hypothesis to be a scientific hypothesis, the scientific method requires....

researchmethod.net

Theoretically, that is true. Theoretically, if I shot you in one foot with a 12 ga. shotgun and it hurt like hell, that does in no way prove that if I shot you in the other foot with a 12 ga. it would also hurt.

I really doubt that you want me to shoot you in either foot with a 12 ga. to see whether it would hurt ... right?

See? Some things go beyond simple "beliefs".

Jim

Please don’t shoot me! As a cure for pseudo-intellectualism it will be a little excessive…

 

[Jim Taylor]

Please don’t shoot me! As a cure for pseudo-intellectualism it will be a little excessive…

Yes ... but only a little.

Jim

 

[BDWoody]

Can you prove there is no better method?

Scientific method is no more than a method. The so called “conclusions” are in fact “hypothesis”. As a hypothesis cannot be verified by the method, just contradicted, it will be always a “belief”.
So science is a set of collective beliefs taken as universal truths.

Is there a point to all this?

Please don’t shoot me! As a cure for pseudo-intellectualism it will be a little excessive…

That's enough. Your act has worn thin.

 

[sam_adams]

Can you prove that a person cannot walk on the surface of the sun?

The Sun does not have a solid surface like the Earth or the other rocky planets in the Solar System.

 

[Blumlein 88]

The Sun does not have a solid surface like the Earth or the other rocky planets in the Solar System.

Oh yeah? Can you prove the surface has to be solid for someone to walk upon it? /s

 

[pkane]

Please don’t shoot me! As a cure for pseudo-intellectualism it will be a little excessive…

Yes ... but only a little.

But likely to be effective, and to a great measure -- satisfying

 

[antcollinet]

This is precisely science… just replace “personal” by “collective” and you get its definition

You are sounding very much like a troll right now.

EDIT : Seems I'm late to the party.

 

[Basic Channel]

Regardless of my biological classification (troll or uneducated idiot), I’m making some philosophical digressions, not mines unfortunately, culturally existed before me… in Descartes “Discourse de la Méthode”

Non cogitas, ergo non es

 

[Miss_Sissy]

Personally I’m not offended, I think it was just a communication error…

You started to participate in a point of a light and slightly comical philosophical debate

Without the benefit of seeing facial expressions or hearing telltale intonations and chuckles, it's often difficult to discern when someone is "kidding" in an online discussion. That's where emojis/smilies come in. Even an occasional "{kidding}" can help immensely.

Did you, perchance, end up here when your browser autocorrected AudioSeanceReview to AudioScienceReview?

 

[MacClintock]

Any truth to this ? Not that it would matter, there is no relevant content above 20kHz, but still?