BrokenEnglishGuy
Major Contributor
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2020
- Messages
- 1,992
- Likes
- 1,188
pretty much in the hd800s level.
Etys lack air and bass, 58X have some treble fluctuations and lack of sub-bass so of the ones you mentioned that I've tried, they both could benefit from EQ filters over 5dB. Less correction than most headphones maybe.shure srh840
etymotic er4s
hifiman ananda
then k612, hd58x
Etymotics don't lack any bass or air.Etys lack air and bass, 58X have some treble fluctuations and lack of sub-bass so of the ones you mentioned that I've tried, they both could benefit from EQ filters over 5dB. Less correction than most headphones maybe.
They definitely lack bass relative to the harman target, and they lack 3-5dB of air in my experience (10K+ measurements are unreliable). How much FR deviation is enough to be bothersome is subjective.Etymotics don't lack any bass or air.
58x 612 are in the second tier basically. They do benefit from EQ but you don't need to. You can enjoy as they are without being bothered by their characteristics.
The bass on Harman Target is complete BS in my book. The treble on er4s is probably the flatest ever. If any it's a bit elevated around 10k-14k.They definitely lack bass relative to the harman target, and they lack 3-5dB of air in my experience (10K+ measurements are unreliable). How much FR deviation is enough to be bothersome is subjective.
I disagree with the shape of the shelf but some sort of bass boost is needed especially on IEMs. Either way, I find the Ety 10K+ region recessed relative to most other neutral headphones. The rest of the treble is pretty much perfect, I'll give you that.The bass on Harman Target is complete BS in my book. The treble on er4s is probably the flatest ever. If any it's a bit elevated around 10k-14k.
Emmm. Do you hear a peak around 8khz-9khz? If so you are not wearing them deep enough.I disagree with the shape of the shelf but some sort of bass boost is needed especially on IEMs. Either way, I find the Ety 10K+ region recessed relative to most other neutral headphones. The rest of the treble is pretty much perfect, I'll give you that.
The peak I hear is at 7.5K. Other neutral headphones refers to moondrops, hd600, and room corrected speakers.Emmm. Do you hear a peak around 8khz-9khz? If so you are not wearing them deep enough.
IEC 711 and IEC 60318-4 is accurate if insert to the reference plane like er4. Both measurements and sine sweep listening test comparing to flat speakers, certainly shows more pronounced 10-14k region.
As you also mentioned 'other neutral headphones', what are they? There's a chance you are actually looking for a peak in the highs than flat 10k+ region.
Ok you are not remotely wearing them deep enough. You should hear a bit recessed 8khz and a bit boost 10-14khz.The peak I hear is at 7K. Other neutral headphones refers to moondrops, hd600, and room corrected speakers.
They won't go in any deeper (already sealed around the largest flange), so I guess I'll just have to live with EQ. Not really much of an issue for me. I did notice the 6K peak on some of the moondrops, so I'll have to check out the illumination. I've been on the fence about it due to that particular issue.Ok you are not remotely wearing them deep enough. You should hear a bit recessed 8khz and a bit boost 10-14khz.
Many of moondrops has the shallow inserting issue that you have a peak at 6-7khz. The new illumination is certainly improved on this. But including blessing 2, S8, KXXS, Starfield, these are still having this issue. The issue is originally found on Kanas/Kanas pro (which I was somewhat involved in the tuning process), after that they tried hard to manage to solve the issue but not until illumination (solis didn't have the issue either for some reason) have they solved the issue.
Yes er4s should be comparable to hd600 in 10k+ region.
As far as I know no other manufacturers(than moondrop and etymotic) have solve the issue(notice the issue even). Only a couple of models that doesn't seem to have a pronounced issue. Etymotic basically solved it by pushing the peak to 13khz where the driver itself has a dip at 13khz so they match each other forming a flat 10khz response. Isine from Audeze doesn't seem to suffer from it either but its acoustic response is already bad enough that only with eq/or the cable can save it. It's a matter of the impedance in the ear canal and its interaction with the iem.They won't go in any deeper (already sealed around the largest flange), so I guess I'll just have to live with EQ. Not really much of an issue for me. I did notice the 6K peak on some of the moondrops, so I'll have to check out the illumination. I've been on the fence about it due to that particular issue.
I think some companies pull back parts of the treble region to address this issue. I don't hear a peak there on my U12t but there's so many other colorations to the FR that it can hardly be called a neutral IEM.As far as I know no other manufacturers(than moondrop and etymotic) have solve the issue(notice the issue even). Only a couple of models that doesn't seem to have a pronounced issue. Etymotic basically solved it by pushing the peak to 13khz where the driver itself has a dip at 13khz so they match each other forming a flat 10khz response. Isine from Audeze doesn't seem to suffer from it either but its acoustic response is already bad enough that only with eq/or the cable can save it. It's a matter of the impedance in the ear canal and its interaction with the iem.
Another IEM that doesn't seem to suffer from this is Sony(Ericson) Mh-1(c)/(a).
Are you familiar with the Shure E500PTH? If yes, what issues are you aware of? ThanksAs far as I know no other manufacturers(than moondrop and etymotic) have solve the issue(notice the issue even).
They won't go in any deeper (already sealed around the largest flange)
Er2xr is a bit too far off from my target. Even er2se needs the stock foam to boost some highs.
I will never use presets on the internet especially the ones directly derived from measurement. (not saying you shouldn't use them)
It will take me only a couple of minutes to eq a pair of headphones from horrible to terrific just by ear. It's not that I am still searching for the sound. I know what it should sound like but I accept that different headphones(has to be already good enough) having slight variations.
Seems to be more common these days - I've read a fair amount of stories about failing Beyers in the last weeks. But then again, they are common here.
In your picture the worksmanship looks really bad, way worse than the older (and cheaper) Beyers I have taken apart. Looks almost as bad as my HE-35X
Ouch... This (unless these are JPG artifacts on the photo) looks like a seriously bad wiring/soldering job... Did you buy the headphones new? If yes, I would show it to either the dealer or the manufacturer. The possibility of a driver failing with normal cleaning is minimal, but there might be more "sins" along the wiring path / solder joints.My DT 1990 Pros just died...
Well, the AKG 812/872 get widely panned too - I'd love to see those on the bench. Whether they are objectively better/ worse than these, the HD820 etc is not saying much either way. But they will be better than the Abyss
I find it fascinating that the Harman family can produce some ToTL cans seemingly oblivious to Dr Olive and co's efforts in the other room. View attachment 111330
Well, the AKG 812/872 get widely panned too - I'd love to see those on the bench. Whether they are objectively better/ worse than these, the HD820 etc is not saying much either way. But they will be better than the Abyss
I find it fascinating that the Harman family can produce some ToTL cans seemingly oblivious to Dr Olive and co's efforts in the other room. View attachment 111330