Fuses were burned so I was banned instead of any changes.
Given your tone here, I can imagine why that is. It's a shame really given the knowledge you can bring to the table.
P.S. My original post was about removing product ranking with frequency responses only.
It's not truly poor, just one-sided. At the end of the day, frequency response (off and on-axis) is the major factor in speaker sound, so a good first filter. And indeed many more factors should be included when deciding on a certain speaker design. But the ranking is just a ranking by preference score, one can also make a ranking by price, size, or many other parameters. And
@amirm's ranking is just his personal preference. You can just choose to completely ignore that. Would it be good to have more rankings? Sure, add distortion profile, waterfall (but I'd rather see it normalized by cycles, not ms), or whatever you want. But most of that data is already available anyway for anyone to see. Could there be more? Probably. I'd love to see a multitone, like for DAC's and amps, but apparently, that measurement doesn't work well at the moment with the current Kippel setup. I also like the dynamic test that Erins is doing for instance.
Shameful that some...many members don't understand how poor that is.
Who are those people? I could be wrong, but I don't think you will find very many of them. And the ones you will find are probably beginners that would not (yet) understand the other intricacies anyway. You could argue that learning them one preference score as a ranking is a bad thing, but I see it as a nice entry point in the interesting world of speaker measurements.