i am contributing as much as you are.
im asking once more. Why was this thread created in the first place?
what is the ‘ other angle’. that I have to agree with you , or I’m an outcast?
what on earth??
no one is talking about ‘ the unknown’ or some mystical things here.
we are talking about volume matched blind tests.
what, do you want a thesis on it?
where is your thesis on the contrary?
im confused.
all I’m saying is that I can successfully hear the differences between DACs which measure about the same. Blindly and volume matched.
and I’m also saying that all that has been discovered for audio quantification has not been done yet.
now what?
Saying it isn't enough.
You see, you are claiming that you can hear things that the standard science, such as it might be, says you can't.
So you are the one making the claim that needs to be verified.
It's time to hold yourself to your own claimed high standard. Where is your thesis? Where are your papers? Can you detail your experiment so that it can be repeated by others and verified?
The one thing that will get you nowhere here is a vague claim. We don't accept "I can", but "I did, this is how, and I will do it again, under controlled conditions, to prove it".
Time and again we hear this stuff, but it never gets beyond a claim or an insufficiently controlled test environment.
As soon as it does happen, properly, I guarantee you that we will change our tune. How many years is it now? A lot longer than I've been on this forum.
Your turn.