Please ignore this, it is apparently completely wrong and too late for me to edit it.I believe I traced the SIGNAL LED on mine back to one of the audio output pins on the ADAU1701. It only monitors one audio channel, OUTB R. I would have thought they would have used one of the ADAU’s GPIO pins, but there wasn’t anything in the SigmaStudio project Wondom posted.
@Hue, thanks for testing this!Bypassing the voltage regulator is by far the easiest route to take. A jumper across connecting the two inductors (after removal of U203) does supply 5V to the analog output stage. Clipping still occurs around the final output line drivers. Is it possible there are diodes connected across the audio output lines? Those 3 legged devices might be diodes, or are they transistors?? With the 5 v modification the audio output is much higher on the stage prior to the output liner driver. I may opt to rewire the RCA output jacks accordingly (possibly with a series capacitor to preclude DC on the jack).
Any opinions on using this with one of those I2S IO's to make a 3 way active crossover? https://store.sure-electronics.com/product/745 I plan to set up POTS 1,2 and 3 to control levels on each band. How does the CS4334 compare to the internal DAC's?SPDIF would be nice but the ADAU1701 does not have onboard SPDIF RX/TX. Its ADCs and DACs (even cascaded) are perfectly adequate for almost any purpose and have been measured here. Four I2S IO are potentially internally accessible but this unit targets those in search of a more "plug and play" solution. It is effectively a cheaper, vastly more functional MiniDSP 2x4 (which also makes use of the ADAU1701).
If you need to make use of the I2S output, then you will no longer be able to use the leftmost potentiometer. Both are configurable functions of the same pin.Any opinions on using this with one of those I2S IO's to make a 3 way active crossover? https://store.sure-electronics.com/product/745 I plan to set up POTS 1,2 and 3 to control levels on each band. How does the CS4334 compare to the internal DAC's?
with this one, do you still need a USBi programmer or can you just plug it to your computer via USB?My Nvarcher unit arrived this morning. This little board has really impressed me.
It is capable of driving both my Sundaras and KSC75s to very reasonable levels with EQ. To my knowledge, this is the only USB DAC with a headphone amplifier (~40mW into 32 Ohms per datasheet), subwoofer crossover, Bluetooth (with TWS pairing), line level input (accessible via USB) and 40 bands of PEQ available under $15. The closest alternatives (MiniDSP IL-DSP and Quidelix-5K) both cost more than ten times as much.
This board represents absurd value for money. I'm going to order a few more!
USBi is not required. It is configured directly via USB (while also supporting simultaneous USB audio), using ACPWorkbench.with this one, do you still need a USBi programmer or can you just plug it to your computer via USB?
(i have been following your finds, but so far resisted because i have no use for them, but this one is simply too good to pass, thanks!)
USBi is not required. It is configured directly via USB (while also supporting simultaneous USB audio), using ACPWorkbench.How is the
Any plans for more testing? I'm wondering how clean the output is. How well does it work with an amp? Would a 10k input amp need a caps? On a 2.1 system I would think only the sub would need one, if at all.Testing the output of this board with various headphones confirms my suspicion that the output coupling capacitors are undersized. They were not selected with the goal of utilizing all of the DSP's output capabilities in mind. Low impedance headphones suffer from significant low frequency rolloff. There is only 1.5V of bias on the output, so paralleling a pair of 10V 220uF electrolytics solves the problem and brings the RC cutoff down to 20Hz for 32 Ohm headphones. They also happen to fit perfectly between the 3.5mm jack housings, which is convenient.
With this modification, it drives my Sundaras to very reasonable volumes with EQ. I will be printing a simple enclosure for it.
Any plans for more testing? I'm wondering how clean the output is. How well does it work with an amp? Would a 10k input amp need a caps? On a 2.1 system I would think only the sub would need one, if at all.
The 4KHz spur decreases in amplitude as the fundamental frequency increases. I would fully recommend purchasing one of these. With the exception of this very minor issue, it represents incredible value for money.I'm not following, since the 40hz peak and 4k spike appear unrelated on the graphs. But I take it you would not recoment we purchase one of thses?
Do the switches short the pin to ground? If so, I should be able to connect a twisted pair in cat5 cable to the pin and ground at that point to give the best noise rejection posible. Nothing is labeled as using pins 1 or 6 on my unit. One of those is surely for the bussy led. But I would asume the power led is just connected to one of the regulators. 4,5,10, and 11 are reserved for clocks. So doesn't that leave one pin unused?If you need to make use of the I2S output, then you will no longer be able to use the leftmost potentiometer. Both are configurable functions of the same pin.
OK, now I see what the graphs are. I;m kind of new to thais subject. You have to be eally listening close to hear that note 40db down from the 40hz note. If that noise is comming from a dac, might it be mostly eliminatd if you were using t as a 2.1 output instead of for headphones? Since the 40hz note and the 10k note would be on dacs, or at least different seakers.The 4KHz spur decreases in amplitude as the fundamental frequency increases. I would fully recommend purchasing one of these. With the exception of this very minor issue, it represents incredible value for mon
Obviously an awesome value at 15 dollars. If I hadn't already purchased the Wondom one I would have used it for the active subwoofer crossover I hope to eventually get around to installing. Of course had the amp sitting around for years now and have bought another vehicle and am yet to get it done.The 4KHz spur decreases in amplitude as the fundamental frequency increases. I would fully recommend purchasing one of these. With the exception of this very minor issue, it represents incredible value for money.
Performance is about what one might expect. Schmoo is just under 80dB, with the usual spurious garbage.
View attachment 340352
Things become quite interesting at 40Hz, with a relatively loud 4KHz spur appearing. This can actually be heard accompanying loud kick drums if listeni
When I use a distortion calculator I come u with 3% at 40hz. (if I'm doing it correctly)If you can hear that you have exceptional hearing. Distortion at that low a frequency is especially hard to hear. There is a post on ASR that references a study that says bellow 120 hz most people can't detect anything bellow something like 10%.Performance is about what one might expect. Schmoo is just under 80dB, with the usual spurious garbage.
View attachment 340352
Things become quite interesting at 40Hz, with a relatively loud 4KHz spur appearing. This can actually be heard accompanying loud kick drums if listening very carefully.
View attachment 340353