DonR
Major Contributor
Well... that escalated quickly.
Yes, it did. Frankly I saw little to nothing to give me a red alert. I asked a question and received a answer. The stressful and merciless training I received in the electronics study made me flexible and appreciative of any information I can get about stuff. I made a obvious mistake in electronics theory, I should have double checked my figures with multiple approaches to the problem before setting up parameters and that was cleared up pretty clearly. No big deal. If that was some sort of shocker for some peeps they should have been there when I studied electronics. The instructors where very bluntly clear in explanations and hammered me till I got the ideas clearly in my mind at the time no matter what my mood was at the time. A simple comment regarding my techniques and my approach is no big deal. As another observation I have is that some peeps here really hash out stuff with some pretty blunt and sometimes aggressive banter and I've grown to not be surprised or shocked by that stuff. So I'm not in any way manner shape or form stressed.Well... that escalated quickly.
There's no need for slagging anybody.Larry B. Loser be
Did you not see the smiley face? I made the correction knowing full well that member @Doodski knows his stuff and in just this case, he goofed a bit. So I said it in lighthearted way as indicated by the smiley.You know perfectly well that he meant continuous power.
Now that I think of it.
Is it necessary to to talk down to a forum member with over 9000 posts as if he knows nothing of the subject.
The results must by definition also work for resistive load.Interesting results from your calculations. Ohm's law is only applicable to a purely resistive circuit, or an AC circuit with a power factor of one (non reactive)
Can you rephrase your question? I'm not sure what you are asking.But wait now. I'm not an EE but some of you who write in this thread are right? EE or engineers. Ohm's law was read about in primary school, if I remember correctly. So everyone read that in the physics lesson.Though it may be as Doodski said:
How come you disagree with it, Ohm's law, now?
I'm just trying to figure this out with RMS, temporary peak of power (dynamic power, if that's what it's talking about?) And Ohm (mentioned in the thread). I can not concretize it more than that. Sorry.Can you rephrase your question? I'm not sure what you are asking.
Actually I tried to to delete my reply, but I guess I was too late. I think I now recall, maybe wrong though, Amir does his testing into a resistive load, not inductive, therefore ohms law is applicable, if somewhat reactive not so.But wait now. I'm not an EE but some of you who write in this thread are right? EE or engineers. Ohm's law was read about in primary school, if I remember correctly. So everyone read that in the physics lesson.Though it may be as Doodski said: Ohm's Law can get pretty complicated pretty fast though
How come you disagree with it, Ohm's law, now?
Text written with or without emojis can really make a difference. By the way what is the name of that term that describes when writing ironically and it is perceived as serious and on the contrary seriously written is considered ironic?Did you not see the smiley face?....
RMS is not used here @ ASR when testing amp power output and I assumed that RMS power was quoted. My mistake. I should have approached the problem with varied approaches to prove and disprove the numbers before posting them. That one's on me. Sorry if I confused you.I'm just trying to figure this out with RMS, temporary peak of power (dynamic power, if that's what it's talking about?) And Ohm (mentioned in the thread). I can not concretize it more than that. Sorry.
But do you not really agree? Why did Larry B get so angry?
Some confusion.Translated text:I never saw Ohms Law in primary school...lol. If I did I don't remember.
I see. Primary school in Canada is grades 1 through 7. Then junior high is grades 8 and 9 and then high school is grades 10, 11 and 12 and even a extra year for grade 13 in one province of Canada.Expect some confusion.
"Compulsory school in Sweden consists of the compulsory 9-year school (grades 1–9)"
It is year 9, in the physics lesson that Ohm's team is included in the syllabus. Year 9 is compulsory for everyone.
...
OT:I see. Primary school in Canada is grades 1 through 7. Then junior high is grades 8 and 9 and then high school is grades 10, 11 and 12 and even a extra year for grade 13 in one province of Canada.
Grades 9 if one is taking a optional electronics study in grade 9. They skim Ohm's Law lightly and don't get too demanding on the study. I don't remember if it was taught in the general science class in grade 9. That was along time ago.OT:
Now I became curious, but when do students learn Ohm's law in Canada?
Ohm's law at a basic level.
Aha.Grades 9 if one is taking a optional electronics study in grade 9. They skim Ohm's Law lightly and don't get too demanding on the study. I don't remember if it was taught in the general science class in grade 9. That was along time ago.
Including me?There's no need for slagging anybody.
I was going to say that for stage, reliability is important. But at this price, keeping spares ready is likely acceptable.I wouldn't use it as a HiFi amp, but as a stage amp it's probably just fine.
I believe the fan is thermally controlled and is not spinning very fast when the amp is cold. It did spool up quickly as things heated up however.Fan in any home hifi device is no no for me.
I wonder how much it after all helps if your case has well planned ventilation ?