somebodyelse
Major Contributor
- Joined
- Dec 5, 2018
- Messages
- 3,786
- Likes
- 3,094
Indeed - I've not seen scales like that for a long time.@EXIF68 love that scale ...
Indeed - I've not seen scales like that for a long time.@EXIF68 love that scale ...
The scales.. what should I do? I have no possibility to calibrate the system. So I and also you must live with that funny scales. Thats life. But the printings from the measurement systems are very nice ;-) and not to forget: I's a system for Mac user. So what?
Does somebody know a "better" system for Mac? For my opinion, Fuzzmeasure pro is the only one available....
Take a look here:
http://www.rodetest.com
the same funny scales ,-)
Nice loudspeakers !First listening to this setup is very exciting. Bass response is exceptional for such a small speaker. My wife did‘t belief that bass coming out from this speaker and not from an additional subwoofer. But yes, really deep bass is not there, but for music of all genres more than enough and this to really high leves (but no discolevel at all). the difference in the bass response to the situation before (no additional mass) is not very pronounced, to check this you need really special sources and also a lot of time for evaluating this.
placement of the speakers are now e.g 80cm in front off backwall and e.g. 1m beside side wall. Listening distance is about 2 m from the speakers. Distance between the speakers 2m.
Reproduction off middle and treble, room imaging: there is nothing to worry about. Perfect.
i must take a new picture. the computer in background is disturbig the immage.....
What else have you guys been weighting with those scales???Scale can mean many things, this is what I’m referring to .
I agree... might point exactly, was that you cant fix the 280hz with EQThis is without any EQ or DSP tuning. And I think it doesn’t make sense to optimize the dip around 280Hz because if you place the mic some 20cm around the actual listening position, the frequency response looks a little different and the dip will transform to a small peak or something else.
what window gating the measurement system is using, I don’t know.
How do you think which version would give better bass: passive membrane or bass reflex?First listening to this setup is very exciting. Bass response is exceptional for such a small speaker. My wife did‘t belief that bass coming out from this speaker and not from an additional subwoofer. But yes, really deep bass is not there, but for music of all genres more than enough and this to really high leves (but no discolevel at all). the difference in the bass response to the situation before (no additional mass) is not very pronounced, to check this you need really special sources and also a lot of time for evaluating this.
placement of the speakers are now e.g 80cm in front off backwall and e.g. 1m beside side wall. Listening distance is about 2 m from the speakers. Distance between the speakers 2m.
Reproduction off middle and treble, room imaging: there is nothing to worry about. Perfect.
Bought the plans for the speaker kit before I noticed this threat. Late for the party but nevertheless congrats: that's a beautiful pair of speakers!In my case definetely passive membrane! you can play louder, better bass precision, no port resonances and no problems with air turbulences. And with additional weights you can influence the bass responce you want.
disadvantage: a little more to pay.