Its all true so I don't worry. Do you really think Danny would take this to court and risk the truth coming out?
Danny has to prove defamation. Which would require him to hire technical experts, under oath to counter those who accuse his products and services are fraudulent and employs no science or employs pseudo-science are indeed not correct; and that Danny's products and services are indeed scientifically sound.
Let's let that sink in for a bit. . . . .can I LMAO now?
Who do you think Danny can hire to be the technical expert to put their professional reputation and expertise on the line certifying that his products and services are scientifically sound? Maybe his friend Ron from New Record Day? Or his friend Jay from Jay's Iyagi? Can I LMAO some more now?
Sure he can just hire a lawyer and sue me for the sake of putting financial stress on me, but I am sure I can raise some money from the scientifically minded audio community to counter sue (or I can just use my legal insurance benefit).
Then you have the problem with the court seeing this as a frivolous law suit wasting tax payer's money, the judge will come down pretty hard on that. BTW, Ted Denney tried that on Gene from Audioholics, the court most likely threw that case out.
I want to call Danny the names I did one more time just as my closing LMAO, but I have stated that I need to do better as a member on ASR and I have to respect our host since he is always professional. Having said that, I will leave this topic with my final thoughts:
Danny Ritchie of GR Research based in Texas, has time and time prove that he does not employ real science to virtually any of his products nor services. Danny Ritchie has also proven that his technical skills and knowledge is rather limited yet it appears that he portrays himself as if he is some sort of technical authority. Furthermore, it's shocking (and sickening) to me how many people Danny Ritchie has convinced of such.