• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Vintage Audio: Measurements of Arcam Black Box 3 mk1

SIY

Grand Contributor
Technical Expert
Joined
Apr 6, 2018
Messages
10,559
Likes
25,431
Location
Alfred, NY
In theory, you'll get a bit less noise on the supply. I use soft-recovery routinely because they're not expensive, but you can accomplish the same thing with snubbing.
 

restorer-john

Grand Contributor
Joined
Mar 1, 2018
Messages
12,786
Likes
39,203
Location
Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
Anybody here have an idea why Arcam chose to use "Fast soft-recovery controlled avalanche rectifiers" and not just simple bridge rectifier diodes?

Fashionable at the time I guess and less noise, but it's a simple supply.

It looks like only three of the four diodes got toasty on the PCB. In a full bridge, if one diode fails, you get half wave rectification and all seems ok, although ripple goes through the roof. I've situations in amplifiers where a pair of diodes in a bridge have failed on a CT +/- supply and the thing still works, albeit with a significant level of hum and lack of power.

Something caused them to get cooked. Realistically, it can only be a shorted diode (that opened up later) or the 6800uF cap. The 7805 is not to blame- it won't allow more than 1A anyway, let alone when in free air- it would shutdown well before then from internal temp rise.

Toasting up a PCB like that takes time, so it's not a random event, more a long term slow-cook IMO. Strange.
 
OP
LTig

LTig

Master Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Feb 27, 2019
Messages
5,876
Likes
9,644
Location
Europe
Fashionable at the time I guess and less noise, but it's a simple supply.

It looks like only three of the four diodes got toasty on the PCB. In a full bridge, if one diode fails, you get half wave rectification and all seems ok, although ripple goes through the roof. I've situations in amplifiers where a pair of diodes in a bridge have failed on a CT +/- supply and the thing still works, albeit with a significant level of hum and lack of power.

Something caused them to get cooked. Realistically, it can only be a shorted diode (that opened up later) or the 6800uF cap. The 7805 is not to blame- it won't allow more than 1A anyway, let alone when in free air- it would shutdown well before then from internal temp rise.

Toasting up a PCB like that takes time, so it's not a random event, more a long term slow-cook IMO. Strange.
Thanks. I shall replace them. May I go with the 1N4004 (plenty on stock), or should I be conservative and use my last four 1N5404?
 
OP
LTig

LTig

Master Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Feb 27, 2019
Messages
5,876
Likes
9,644
Location
Europe
In theory, you'll get a bit less noise on the supply. I use soft-recovery routinely because they're not expensive
Which ones do you use? Maybe I can find them here.
but you can accomplish the same thing with snubbing.
Snubbing? Small caps parallel to each diode?
 

SIY

Grand Contributor
Technical Expert
Joined
Apr 6, 2018
Messages
10,559
Likes
25,431
Location
Alfred, NY
I use UF4007 (strictly speaking, fast recovery, but same effect). Stock item at Digikey and Mouser, so likely the same at the European equivalents.

Yes, small cap and large resistor in parallel for snubbing. A neat alternative method was worked out by Morgan Jones; you'll save the cost of the article in parts the first time you use his tricks.
 
OP
LTig

LTig

Master Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Feb 27, 2019
Messages
5,876
Likes
9,644
Location
Europe

Musicofchance

Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2023
Messages
5
Likes
3
Great thread. Did you let it warm up for 2hrs first? Never seen a seperate with instructions like this before (rear panel)

Theres one being sold not far from me for £120. Its a consideration but the findings here arent very inspiring.
 

MaxwellsEq

Major Contributor
Joined
Aug 18, 2020
Messages
1,786
Likes
2,725
Theres one being sold not far from me for £120. Its a consideration but the findings here arent very inspiring
Obviously this is a 4+ year old thread.

But save your money, unless you like collecting old gear. The cheapest dongle DACs costing a few pounds will outperform this in every way.
 
OP
LTig

LTig

Master Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Feb 27, 2019
Messages
5,876
Likes
9,644
Location
Europe
Obviously this is a 4+ year old thread.
And the BB3 is much older, so what.
But save your money, unless you like collecting old gear. The cheapest dongle DACs costing a few pounds will outperform this in every way.
Not necessarily. The BB3 is a DAC with SPDIF inputs and no USB. If you need SPDIF inputs a USB dongle won't do.
 
Top Bottom