Welll... it is not revealing for lay listeners like me. That is what I am trying to say. I know it is hard for technical people to put themselves in our shoes.A look at the images of both products is also quite revealing:
vs
Well...That's one dual channel module VS two mono channel, really nothing revealing to me. But if you wonder, the bigger will deal better with heat dissipation.A look at the images of both products is also quite revealing:
There once were two MPAs, one with XLR, the other with RCA. The new chassis now includes both inputs, while having another (larger) form factor. That's all.There is also this beast, for which, as far as I can tell, the only difference compared to the MPA is the XLR inputs?
The way I understand it, it's 2000W short-term (my 1200AS2 claimed 1200W, mono, but for 90 seconds before the module shuts down). This seems to state without shutdown. Meaning 290W... forever?I should have read the datasheet before I purchased a lot of ICEpower 2000AS2 modules....
The sales department says this:
View attachment 342550
While the truth is more like this:
View attachment 342551
Got it, makes sense.There once were two MPAs, one with XLR, the other with RCA. The new chassis now includes both inputs, while having another (larger) form factor. That's all.
Well...That's one dual channel module VS two mono channel, really nothing revealing to me. But if you wonder, the bigger will deal better with heat dissipation.
There once were two MPAs, one with XLR, the other with RCA. The new chassis now includes both inputs, while having another (larger) form factor. That's all.
The way I understand it, it's 2000W short-term (my 1200AS2 claimed 1200W, mono, but for 90 seconds before the module shuts down). This seems to state without shutdown. Meaning 290W... forever?
Apologies if my question is a bit out of the topic, but I found your remark quite revealing and made me wonder: do you think that two mono purifi amps will have better separation and longevity than the one commented here, the 1 ET-400A? I'm asking because getting two monos at Audiophonics is almost the same price and it might be a better option...Absolutely not. Difference between NC252MP and NC250MP is the fact that you deal with separate modules, with supposedly better separation and longevity for modules SMPS.
The first is described as a "stereo/large single mono dual amplifier [...] based on a duo of Hypex NCore NC250MP modules"
The second, as a "stereo amplifier based on an (single, I presume) amplification module Hypex Ncore NC252MP"
Are they made for different usages?
Hi there, I am considering buying this exact same amp (AP300-S250NC)Apart from what others have mentioned, the first one has both balanced inputs and RCA.
The direct comparison would be with this 2ch version that also has balanced and RCA. (I bought one recently and I am very happy with it)
AUDIOPHONICS AP300-S250NC Power Amplifier Ncore NC252MP
The Audiophonics AP300-S250NC is a stereo amplifier based on a Hypex Ncore NC252MP amplifier module. It is ideal for providing a significant power reserve (2x250W @ 4Ω) without sacrificing sound reproduction quality.www.audiophonics.fr
Could you please tell me the speaker model?Hi there, I am considering buying this exact same amp (AP300-S250NC)
If you don't mind me asking, which speakers are you using it with?
In my case, they are 8 Ohm (min 6Ω) with 86 db, do you think it will be enough amplification power, considering the listening distance is 2.5 meters and I usually listen up to max 85db?
Wharfedale evo 4.2Could you please tell me the speaker model?