This response is elitistic, antiscience, anti-forum and the definition of gatekeeping.
The fact that we have a vast understanding of physics and measurement datasets does not mean that "the science has settled", as the scientific fallacy states.
Measurement interpretation and comparison/correlation to subjective experiences are still essential for in the context of a forum that holds "science" as prefix.
Heck, even the most known metric for preference, flawed or not, is a transfer function calibrated by subjective evaluation.