Suggestion:
Perhaps you could do some preliminary listening tests and EQing before looking at the HP measurements to eliminate bias?
How the heck you eliminate bias in a sighted test like this? I say be afraid, be very afraid of anyone who gives you subject assessments of speakers/headphones without seeing measurements, claiming that is better. They are giving you random opinion of some speaker's sound and who knows if that is accurate at all.
At least I have a compass to guide me as to what impairments I need to pay attention to. With them, you have to trust them blind that they have exceptional hearing and auditory memory to remember speakers from days and weeks past relative to the one tested!
I will do a video on this but it is a serious misconception to think I am giving you pure subjective listening tests results of headphones/speakers. I am not at all doing that.
My listening tests are there to analyze audibility of individual tonality deviations as shown in frequency response measurements. As such, seeing the measurements is absolutely essential to what I do: give you reliable objective analysis of a headphone/speaker.
If you just want some online guy's subjective opinion of a speaker/headphone without any objective guides, the entire Internet/youtube is there for you. But let me caution you: a lot of these people, especially with headphone tests, peak at frequency response. No way would they know about the "200 Hz bump." And for the rest, I don't trust any of them.