έχω δίκιο
Active Member
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2018
- Messages
- 249
- Likes
- 282
If you want to see what someone with experience has to say about this topic, I'll point you here:
http://nwavguy.blogspot.com/2011/08/op-amps-myths-facts.html
Unless you are exceeding the drive capability of the OPA1612, confirmation bias is, by far, the most likely explanation for the audible differences you describe.
But test equipment measured the OPA1612 and the OPA1622 typical THD+N @ 1 kHz figures of 0.000015% and 0.000018% respectively. If you can hear that 0.000003% difference, I'll be very impressed. Do you really think that your ears are comparable in resolving power to a modern Audio Precision analyzer?
http://nwavguy.blogspot.com/2011/08/op-amps-myths-facts.html
perhaps it isnt.
Unless you are exceeding the drive capability of the OPA1612, confirmation bias is, by far, the most likely explanation for the audible differences you describe.
the human ears are capable of detecting the smallest changes in sound... sometimes changes that are difficult/impossible to measure with existing instruments.
But test equipment measured the OPA1612 and the OPA1622 typical THD+N @ 1 kHz figures of 0.000015% and 0.000018% respectively. If you can hear that 0.000003% difference, I'll be very impressed. Do you really think that your ears are comparable in resolving power to a modern Audio Precision analyzer?