I agree that things are a not clearly stated in the manual. But the cited post clears this completely.
However it is coherent with the fact that they call it bi-wiring. Now it is more clear.
I suspected.
Yes now I see
Yes, what I meant is that if they are linked it is equivalent to binding posts.
Searched but not found.
I never came across this post. This takes the last word on this aspect.
@Snoopy you were right. I was mistakenly convinced it was a for channels amplifier.
Thank you all for clarifying this , I was the one doing bi-wiring without realizing!
There is just one problem, and now I am really confused: if it is equivalent to binding posts, why the hell I was able to recognize 14 times over 15 a difference using the two sets A and B with respect to just single set with binding posts?