- Thread Starter
- #21
Empirically from testing probably 50 headphone amplifiers with HD-650.Can I ask how you came up with the 100mW figure?
Empirically from testing probably 50 headphone amplifiers with HD-650.Can I ask how you came up with the 100mW figure?
Can I ask how you came up with the 100mW figure?
Also, you mentioned that 100mW of output was your standard for desktop products. I think most people would agree that the CMoy is a portable product?
Can you clarify what you meant by this? Unless I'm interpreting your THD+N vs. Power chart incorrectly, the CMoy's THD+N is the same at 0.1 mW (100 microW) as it is at 1mW.
With a rail of only 9V or +-4.5V. I don't think there's a lot of opamp that can work well. Perhaps those that convert rail internally. Definitely not normal opamps.I would say that the OPA2227 is wholly unsuited to the application here. Even the datasheet suggests using two opamps in parallel for a headphone amp (admittedly at -/+ 15v)
View attachment 86757
<snip>
27 mW into 300 ohms is 8.0 Vpp, which is realistic to expect out of a 12 V supply. (14 mW would mean 5.7 Vpp, again a fairly typical value out of 9 V.) You could probably get 9-9.6 Vpp out of the thing with an OPA2132/34 or NJM4556AD. Those serious about output power into higher-impedance loads (250+ ohms) would have been building a dual 9 V (split supply) cMoy, which may have provided up to 4-5 Vrms out and as such close to 80 mW into 300 ohms..
<snip>
Some people were running these with two 9V batteries in series (18V). Would this impact power handling?
Unless it's intended to measure poorly, no device should be treated differently. It does not matter if it's designed for high impedance.
In fact, there's literally no design almost at all. No sign of optimizing for high impedance load.
The chart you gave is very old. Fiio, topping etc have several portable devices measured with way higher power than 14mW.
I wonder how a CMoy with 18V, decoupling capacitors, and LM4562 would compare. Maybe I'll dig mine up.More power supply voltage will provide a greater output 'swing' (more output voltage) into a given load, which will mean lower distortion for a given level, as the amplifier is not being pushed to it's limits.
??? The 100 milliwatt is not a pass or fail criteria. It is my target that I like to see amplifiers meet. The NX4 DSD gets 60 milliwatts which is very good for a portable product. It is hugely better than the product tested here seeing how at the point it produces no distortion. It is also very capable with 33 ohm load producing 147 milliwatts whereas the CMOY tested here has no usable response with that load.I think you're right John. I'd like to suggest that we test the Topping NX4 DSD unit at an output of 100mW (Amir's standard) while driving 300 ohm headphones. That should give us a THD+N around 1%? Maybe 2%? 10%? Anyone know?
No device should be treated differently.
I have tested some different opamps in a simple circuit as well (using a scope) about 8 years ago.
It uses a TL2426 rail splitter, has 4 Ohm output R and is measured at 9V and 18V.
Measured with 30, 60, 120, 300, 600 and 10k loads.
I decided to make an upgrade to the NX1s. Though practical speaking 2V into hd600 and dt880 600ohm should be very loud. Whats important is to make sure there's no distortion before clipping.Most problems occur when clipping (current- or voltage-clipping also makes a difference).
People may be doing this sooner than they think.
At 9V and 300 Ohm headphones won't play impressively loud and even decently loud may have some voltage clipping.
For lower impedance headphones current clipping is right around the corner.
For 'normal' listening levels these amps will probably stay below problematic behavior and actually sound quite good.
When using high impedance headphones 18V (+/-9V) is about the minimum required for louder listening levels.