carlosmante
Active Member
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2018
- Messages
- 211
- Likes
- 162
"Stacked bar chart" . .https://chartio.com/learn/charts/stacked-bar-chart-complete-guide/What would you suggest?
"Stacked bar chart" . .https://chartio.com/learn/charts/stacked-bar-chart-complete-guide/What would you suggest?
A stacked bar graph is for showing a total amount of something divided up into subgroups (demographics, expenses, etc.)."Stacked bar chart" . .https://chartio.com/learn/charts/stacked-bar-chart-complete-guide/
Amir posts these as graphs, no data points, so I can’t analyze them.If there was/is a similar metric for speaker impedance, that would be great to see as well, giving a better sense of true complementing amplification needs. Edit: as in restorer-john’s earlier post
What would you suggest?
I get what you mean about it not being a continuous range, I chose not to do that as it isn’t as easy to see the differences compared to the line chart, though I could be swayed. Error bars are for +/- values, which isn’t what we have here.It should be a scatter chart with error bars. Using a line chart is incorrect because the x axis consists of categories rather than a continuous range of values.
Try a column graph. Places the values side by side.What would you suggest?
Error bars are for +/- values, which isn’t what we have hear.
Explains why my Klipsch RP600M were disappointing with my 2A3 amplifier. Glad I sold them.
It should also be noted that achieviing higher linearity can result in a overall lower sensitivity. This can be a design choice in products such as Klipsch where a flatter response may be sacrificed to achieve a higher sensitivity rating
What would you suggest?
I wish I had some good data on the various ESL's I've owned. Acoustats claimed like Soundlabs to be 88 db/watt/meter. In fact I'd say more like 78 or 80 is for real with a heavy lean toward 78 db.
Stereophile did measure 101 db/2.83v/meter which was lower than the claimed 105 db for the K-horns, but still awfully high.