• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Tekton M-Lore Speaker Review

Rate this speaker:

  • 1. Poor (headless panther)

    Votes: 283 59.0%
  • 2. Not terrible (postman panther)

    Votes: 175 36.5%
  • 3. Fine (happy panther)

    Votes: 15 3.1%
  • 4. Great (golfing panther)

    Votes: 7 1.5%

  • Total voters
    480

DSJR

Major Contributor
Joined
Jan 27, 2020
Messages
3,451
Likes
4,619
Location
Suffolk Coastal, UK
Regarding threaded holes for feet or spikes which may well have been a UK thing which started forty odd years ago? -

It was commonplace for makers to fit plinths of sorts to the bottom of the carcasses into which the spikes or feet were screwed - Here's a couple I've just pulled off the internet at random -

1714120304920.jpeg
1714120369949.jpeg
 

markus

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Sep 8, 2019
Messages
712
Likes
824
Regarding threaded holes for feet or spikes which may well have been a UK thing which started forty odd years ago? -

It was commonplace for makers to fit plinths of sorts to the bottom of the carcasses into which the spikes or feet were screwed - Here's a couple I've just pulled off the internet at random -

View attachment 365942 View attachment 365943
It's a cheap and simple way of having adjustable feet. Nothing to complain about.

The issue in this thread is that the manufacturer claims the speaker performance would suffer without the feet installed (which it factually does not as the measurements show). Nowhere does the manufacturer state that feet need to be installed, not on his website nor in the manual (which also makes false claims about the recommended listening axis).

Now when someone measures the speaker without the feet installed he legally threatens the reviewer. On which planet does that make any sense?
 

YSC

Major Contributor
Joined
Dec 31, 2019
Messages
3,222
Likes
2,626
It's a cheap and simple way of having adjustable feet. Nothing to complain about.

The issue in this thread is that the manufacturer claims the speaker performance would suffer without the feet installed (which it factually does not as the measurements show). Nowhere does the manufacturer state that feet need to be installed, not on his website nor in the manual (which also makes false claims about the recommended listening axis).

Now when someone measures the speaker without the feet installed he legally threatens the reviewer. On which planet does that make any sense?
not only does this not making any sense, that supersonic blowhole claim is more counter intiutive....
 

musicforcities

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2021
Messages
427
Likes
492
I think something changed with him around this time. In the not too distant past he used to do worthwhile comparisons of products by feature-sets to really help amateurs find value in products. Then it became voodoo gear and weird shit.

I have heard many people talk about hearing differences in gear (including cables). As much as objective measurement is why I'm here, it has also become clear that "gear synergy" is a thing. Just seeing certain measurements of amps and speakers will tell you that two pieces of kit having the same type of issue (say, rising treble) won't help. If you were to swap in something that measures poorly but in the other direction, it could help the overall situation even if objectively it's a turd on its own.

I firmly believe a lot of people are hearing these differences but aren't educated enough to know why; or they are and don't care to admit it for the sake of views and manufacturer relationships.

The truth is that it's best to hear it all (IMO) so I stay subscribed. Also, he drops deal alerts.

I will admit that I have thought I “heard” differences between cables: but I recognize now that either a) my ears/mind was fooling me, or b) far more rarely, cable in question was poorly designed designed for it purpose—for example wildly high capacitance for its use which turned the cable into an unpredictable filter if used with certain equipment. Specifically, I have experienced that effect when using a weird geometry cable from turntable to phono preamp that with certain cartridge loading and preamps rolled off the highs. Pop a bluejeans or Amazon basics rca there instead as no problem. And I was convinced that the 18ft runs of Kimber 4PR speaker wire do something with certain combos of amps and speakers— they do have measurably lower impedance and much higher capacitance per foot than same gauge zip cord so it’s possible I guess.

But thanks to ASR, no more snake oil for me. I prefer science and reason. Even in the exceptional cases were maybe it’s possible that the cable is doing something audible, EQ is better managed by things designed to do it.

To eschew things like tone controls in the name of purity but treat cables as alchemical eq filters, is evidence of audiophile derangement. To entertain or give a platform for it on a YouTube channel promoting itself as seeking no b.s. low cost high quality audio, is I believe a real disservice to its watchers.
 

musicforcities

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2021
Messages
427
Likes
492
I started in audio at a time when "gear synergy" was definitely a thing. I AM SO GLAD THAT IT DOES NOT NEED TO BE AN ISSUE IN THIS DAY AND AGE THAT I CANNOT ADEQUATELY EXPRESS MY JOY!

It was like seeking to avoid potholes in a dark room while you're blindfolded; more failure than success. That's one of the major reasons that I continually harp on the advantage of tests and measurements; they've added light to the quest and removed the blindfold!

I can assure you, audio gear that is provably well-designed is a blessing! :)

Jim
I surmise that way back in the day, there was some technical basis for the premise of “gear synergy” or at least matching in terms of input - output impedance mismatch as a well as input sensitivity and output voltage levels, etc. those days are long gone of course…
 

alexanderino

Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2023
Messages
43
Likes
25
Box losses [4 leaking holes] are easy to predict and measure. Furthermore, once we get into the 5-10 watt range the air pressure jets in and out of them at speeds above Mach1 and they get audible. Hard to fathom a top-notch reviewer not discerning audible jet sounds coupled with Nora Jones and Diana Krall!
Are you serious? at >300m/s speed of air at that hole size is likely hazardous to the table/ desk or any living things somehow going pass it (e.g. cats), if that is attainable with a large enough air volume moving to create the issue in FR, I would believe it is dangerous to the user...
Free sonic booms — the hallmark of audiophile speakers — for Tekton customers!
 

YSC

Major Contributor
Joined
Dec 31, 2019
Messages
3,222
Likes
2,626
Free sonic booms — the hallmark of audiophile speakers — for Tekton customers!
funny part to me is that with the original review, with the open holes left as is, the speaker don't really look that bad, but after these kind of "reasoning" bs... it becomes apparent to me that at least those who design the M Lore either cheap out to the max and did't remember to use some metal female socket to seal the holes when the spikes arn't used, or just don't want to complete the speaker for those who don't pay extra for the spikes, or just simply don't understand fully what they are doing.. epic example of self breaking reputation
 

Yevhen

Active Member
Forum Donor
Joined
Dec 12, 2020
Messages
188
Likes
83
Location
Netherlands
I believe Eric has repeatedly stated in the forum and in videos that the screw holes reach airspeed Mach 1, leading to significant audible sound impairments.

As you mentioned, turbulence reduces airspeed, and what Eric doesn't mention is that you would need to operate the speaker with SPL >95dB to theoretically achieve such airspeed in the screw holes (without considering turbulence).

Furthermore, the resonance frequency of the screw holes is likely around 25Hz. Therefore, with normal music material, the resonance is almost never excited, and thus, no whistling or similar phenomena can be observed.

Additionally, 25Hz is well below the BR tuning frequency of around 50Hz. Therefore, at SPL >95dB and a 25Hz music signal, there is the risk that the voice coil hits the back plate of the motor (if the woofer cone is not extremely rigidly suspended).

One would need to experiment with sine tones between 15-30Hz to see if any whistling through the screw holes can be detected since normal music signal will not excite the screw hole resonance.
Here is a simulation for my 10'' woofer project. Tuning frequency: 24Hz. I replaced my regular 10cm port with 4 holes 6mm. Unfortunately, my software does not alow to scale up/down this graph but it might be that the CALCULATED speed of air reaches 100% speed of sound.
1714458316468.png


Here is the simulation for my regular port size (5% speed of sound):
1714458540930.png


All this happens with the reasonable driver excursion of +/-10mm:
1714458685789.png
 

cavedriver

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Jul 10, 2020
Messages
724
Likes
817
Location
Maryland, USA
Here is a simulation for my 10'' woofer project. Tuning frequency: 24Hz. I replaced my regular 10cm port with 4 holes 6mm. Unfortunately, my software does not alow to scale up/down this graph but it might be that the CALCULATED speed of air reaches 100% speed of sound.
View attachment 366792
That's a good idea about how he might have reached his erroneous conclusions. Had he thought it through a bit further he would have realized that the pressure necessary to drive the air at that speed through holes of that short a length would have exceeded the mechanical limits of the housing (the speaker would have exploded...). If the holes were much longer you could maybe do it at pressures that wouldn't break the speaker cabinet (and possibly the woofer cones). Which software is that?
 

Yevhen

Active Member
Forum Donor
Joined
Dec 12, 2020
Messages
188
Likes
83
Location
Netherlands
That's a good idea about how he might have reached his erroneous conclusions. Had he thought it through a bit further he would have realized that the pressure necessary to drive the air at that speed through holes of that short a length would have exceeded the mechanical limits of the housing (the speaker would have exploded...). If the holes were much longer you could maybe do it at pressures that wouldn't break the speaker cabinet (and possibly the woofer cones). Which software is that?
SpeakerSim
 

Darthprater

Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2024
Messages
14
Likes
64
Actually, I think I misinterpreted that. He twisted my words a bit. Honestly I really dislike the idea that he’s just gonna keep doing this. But he will never own up to it, and he has customers that just don’t care or choose ignorance. What do you do
 

ahofer

Master Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jun 3, 2019
Messages
5,064
Likes
9,185
Location
New York City
Whoa! 125 pages why still bother with this company? Have you heard even bad publicity is good! Ah ah no seriously Amir should close this thread!
I'm here for the full screw-hole interrogation.
 

Gringoaudio1

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Forum Donor
Joined
Sep 11, 2019
Messages
608
Likes
827
Location
Calgary Alberta Canada
If there are any doubts about giving him money, why not just go for a second hand unit? It'll come up sooner or later (probably sooner). Other options are buying a single speaker, or returning them after the measurements (based on failing to achieve the marketing claims which I'm sure will happen)
There is a set of double impact speakers in Victoria BC which is quite close to Amir. $3000 Cdn which is $2300 US.
 
Top Bottom