I tested a Hugo 2 a while back but it was with my old analyzer. So a member kindly sent me an original Hugo DAC and headphone amplifier to remeasure. I wa shocked to find out that the Hugo cost US $2,500 when it came out!!! Man that is expensive for a portable DAC and Amp.
Here is a shot of it if you have not seen it:
I can't stand the lights you have to have a decoder ring to decipher. The tiny power slider. General lack of labeling, etc.
For this testing, I took advantage of putting the RCA out at fixed level so there is no complaints about using volume control. Speaking of volume control, the rotary plastic knob is super stiff to turn. Not sure if they degrade to this or came this way. Definitely does not feel good. But I guess if you put it in your pocket it won't change on its own easily.
Anyway, the purpose is the measurements so let's get into that.
DAC Audio Measurements
I tested the DAC portion by feeding the Hugo using USB and measuring what came out of the RCA jacks using fixed line out mode:
As you see, the Hugo outputs that oddball 3 volt. It is not a bad thing but is more than nominal 2 volt we expect. Performance may be better at 2 volt but as it is, the SINAD (signal over noise and distortion) is quite good for a portable product at 109 dB:
Jitter performance was likewise good other than a couple of inconsequential spikes:
Chord's claim to fame are very large tap filters. We can see their response by feeding the DAC white noise and see what comes out after fair bit of averaging:
I like the super sharp cut off at required bandwidth (22.05 kHz). There is some relaxing after a while which should be fine. Certainly better than a lot of DACs which take their time to get to 24 kHz and beyond.
Linearity was perfect:
IMD results show a bit higher noise level than our reference but otherwise is good:
Dynamic range is very good as well:
Headphone Amplifier Audio Measurements
Let's start with signal to noise ratio at full output level (which clipped horribly) and just 50 millivolts:
Full range is fine but 50 millivolt is not that great:
There is likely some hiss with sensitive IEMs.
Most important here is THD+N versus power. Let's start with 300 ohm load:
Was surprised that at the high gain of the amplifier causing the graph to start pretty late. My testing is at full volume though so in practice, you can reduce the level and be fine.
Power is good at 65 milliwatts. Certainly a lot better than a phone or dongle.
Switching to 33 ohm we get:
Noise floor+distortion rise fair bit now. But we still have plenty of power for a portable product at nearly 0.4 watts.
Output impedance is quite low and hence good:
Conclusions
Typical of Chord products, even the version one of Hugo is competently designed, approaching performance of desktop DACs. As noted though, I can't stand their user interface, the looks, or the sky high price. So can't recommend it personally but you have the data to use as you see fit.
------------
As always, questions, comments, recommendations, etc. are welcome.
I have been doing so many reviews I am fresh out of lame jokes. So I make this simple: Please donate money using : https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/how-to-support-audio-science-review.8150/
Amir
Here is a shot of it if you have not seen it:
For this testing, I took advantage of putting the RCA out at fixed level so there is no complaints about using volume control. Speaking of volume control, the rotary plastic knob is super stiff to turn. Not sure if they degrade to this or came this way. Definitely does not feel good. But I guess if you put it in your pocket it won't change on its own easily.
Anyway, the purpose is the measurements so let's get into that.
DAC Audio Measurements
I tested the DAC portion by feeding the Hugo using USB and measuring what came out of the RCA jacks using fixed line out mode:
As you see, the Hugo outputs that oddball 3 volt. It is not a bad thing but is more than nominal 2 volt we expect. Performance may be better at 2 volt but as it is, the SINAD (signal over noise and distortion) is quite good for a portable product at 109 dB:
Jitter performance was likewise good other than a couple of inconsequential spikes:
Chord's claim to fame are very large tap filters. We can see their response by feeding the DAC white noise and see what comes out after fair bit of averaging:
I like the super sharp cut off at required bandwidth (22.05 kHz). There is some relaxing after a while which should be fine. Certainly better than a lot of DACs which take their time to get to 24 kHz and beyond.
Linearity was perfect:
IMD results show a bit higher noise level than our reference but otherwise is good:
Dynamic range is very good as well:
Headphone Amplifier Audio Measurements
Let's start with signal to noise ratio at full output level (which clipped horribly) and just 50 millivolts:
Full range is fine but 50 millivolt is not that great:
There is likely some hiss with sensitive IEMs.
Most important here is THD+N versus power. Let's start with 300 ohm load:
Was surprised that at the high gain of the amplifier causing the graph to start pretty late. My testing is at full volume though so in practice, you can reduce the level and be fine.
Power is good at 65 milliwatts. Certainly a lot better than a phone or dongle.
Switching to 33 ohm we get:
Noise floor+distortion rise fair bit now. But we still have plenty of power for a portable product at nearly 0.4 watts.
Output impedance is quite low and hence good:
Conclusions
Typical of Chord products, even the version one of Hugo is competently designed, approaching performance of desktop DACs. As noted though, I can't stand their user interface, the looks, or the sky high price. So can't recommend it personally but you have the data to use as you see fit.
------------
As always, questions, comments, recommendations, etc. are welcome.
I have been doing so many reviews I am fresh out of lame jokes. So I make this simple: Please donate money using : https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/how-to-support-audio-science-review.8150/
Amir