- Thread Starter
- #2,261
Oh, I am happy to test them if members send them in.mir probably won't touch one with a stick neither in the future, understandably.
Oh, I am happy to test them if members send them in.mir probably won't touch one with a stick neither in the future, understandably.
Exactly. I really don’t understand how this is supposed to be a valid point…Doesn't mean we want to go for an "ethics race to the bottom" though.
The sad thing would be the speaker to deliver and the only thing stopping people from buying it would be company's attitude.Oh, I am happy to test them if members send them in.
Well, that should be the only thing stopping people from buying the thing. I don’t see a problem here…The sad thing would be the speaker to deliver and the only thing stopping people from buying it would be company's attitude.
Yep, there is no reason to contact the manufacturer in such case. Amir is just reporting and giving his opinion.Historically Amir has contacted the manufacturer if it was the manufacturer who sent in the product . To discuss the results beforehand.
If any member sent in a product he has not contacted the manufacturer . Why should he ? We can send any old discontinued stuff or newly bought stuff . Or out of warranty stuff ? etc etc .
I do,I consider it a loss for both sides,company loosing a client and client loosing a speaker who may suit him for the dumbest reason in existence: ego.Well, that should be the only thing stopping people from buying the thing. I don’t see a problem here…
In some cases people rather wish they did not know how poor something (technically) performs when they sent their devices in for review. These folks probably won't feel like a kingAudio is about the client who must feel like king
Performance is one part of the long "feeling like a king" equation.In some cases people rather wish they did not know how poor something (technically) performs when they sent their devices in for review. These folks probably won't feel like a king
Great read, thanks. It shows why @Eric Alexander still gets support from Tekton owners. He caters to the anti-measurement crowd and perfectly plays them.
I see your point, but it's not my problem, it's Erics..I do,I consider it a loss for both sides,company loosing a client and client loosing a speaker who may suit him for the dumbest reason in existence: ego.
A decent company is about numbers,not egos.And a decent company shouldn't not tie with it's people's attitudes,even if that person is the owner.
I have a feeling it will end like this:Oh, I am happy to test them if members send them in.
But why? In best case scenario it will measure good and Eric won't have any complaints which will just give him good publicity and good measurements he can lean on to sell his speakers, do you really want to give him that? And in worst case scenario he will have lots of complaints, actually sending lawyers on you etc giving you more headace than now. Of course you do whatever you want to do, but I don't understand at all why you would ever want to have anything more to do with Tekton ever again after this. So I'm just curious to your thinking behind this?Oh, I am happy to test them if members send them in.
I don't care about Eric one way or the other. If someone owns one of his speakers and wants to know how it performs, I will do that. No different than testing anything else. If it tests well, then it deserves the positive comments from me. And if it doesn't, the same thing.But why? In best case scenario it will measure good and Eric won't have any complaints which will just give him good publicity and good measurements he can lean on to sell his speakers, do you really want to give him that?
I have a lot more experience with him now. So next time will be easier.And in worst case scenario he will have lots of complaints, actually sending lawyers on you etc giving you more headace than now.
Secretly I hope people sent in Tekton speakers to be reviewed and Amir measures them an gives his opinion. In any case when Eric blows a fuse there will be long threads again...
Yes, thank you.Eric Alexander?
Agreed. Clumsy wording on my part. What I would like ASR and EAC to become is a sort of Consumer Reports/Which for HiFi.Doesn't mean we want to go for an "ethics race to the bottom" though.
Fair enough! Spoken like a true objectivistI don't care about Eric one way or the other. If someone owns one of his speakers and wants to know how it performs, I will do that. No different than testing anything else. If it tests well, then it deserves the positive comments from me. And if it doesn't, the same thing.
I have a lot more experience with him now. So next time will be easier.
Thanks for the link - I agree with much of that article, having dealt with certain individuals over the years. There are also properly qualified UK based (one also wrote/writes for Stereophile sometimes) audio gear measurement 'guru's' who in their day, 'bent the truth' to suit the growing subjectivist crowd in the 80's and carried on after.I think we (I) want the best sounding Tekton with the tweeter array (unique tech) and hope it tests well. Then Amir will say it does and watch what EA does. Erin's tests were not that bad. It just might be that EA hates objective testing. My guess he's a talented seat of the pants designer and has an aversion to scientific analysis. A repost if you missed it.
If someone owns one of his speakers and wants to know how it performs, I will do that. No different than testing anything else.
I admire this attitude.I have a lot more experience with him now. So next time will be easier.